DMA and Interrupt Handling
In this series on hardware basics, we have already looked at read
and write bus cycles. In this article we will cover Direct Memory Access
(DMA) and Interrupt Handling. Knowledge of DMA and interrupt handling would be
useful in writing code that interfaces directly with IO devices (DMA
based serial port design pattern is a good example of such a device).
We will discuss the following topics:
Direct Memory Access (DMA) |
A typical DMA operation is described here. Interactions
between the main CPU and DMA device are covered. The impact of DMA on
processor's internal cache is also covered. |
Interrupt Handling |
Processor handling of hardware interrupts is described in
this section. |
Interrupt Acknowledge Cycle |
Many processors allow the interrupting hardware device to
identify itself. This speeds up interrupt handling as the processor can
directly invoke the interrupt service routine for the right device. |
Synchronization
Requirements for DMA and Interrupts |
Software designers need to keep in mind that DMA
operations can be triggered at bus cycle boundary while interrupts can
only be triggered at instruction boundary. |
- Device wishing to perform DMA asserts the processors bus request signal.
- Processor completes the current bus cycle and then asserts the bus grant
signal to the device.
- The device then asserts the bus grant ack signal.
- The processor senses in the change in the state of bus grant ack signal
and starts listening to the data and address bus for DMA activity.
- The DMA device performs the transfer from the source to destination
address.
- During these transfers, the processor monitors the addresses on the bus
and checks if any location modified during DMA operations is cached in the
processor. If the processor detects a cached address on the bus, it can take
one of the two actions:
- Processor invalidates the internal cache entry for the address
involved in DMA write operation
- Processor updates the internal cache when a DMA write is detected
- Once the DMA operations have been completed, the device releases the bus
by asserting the bus release signal.
- Processor acknowledges the bus release and resumes its bus cycles from the
point it left off.
Here we describe interrupt handling in a scenario where the hardware does not
support identifying the device that initiated the interrupt. In such cases, the
possible interrupting devices need to be polled in software.
- A device asserts the interrupt signal at a hardwired interrupt level.
- The processor registers the interrupt and waits to finish the current
instruction execution.
- Once the current instruction execution is completed, the processor
initiates the interrupt handling by saving the current register contents on
the stack.
- The processor then switches to supervisor mode and initiates an interrupt
acknowledge cycle.
- No device responds to the interrupt acknowledge cycle, so the processor
fetches the vector corresponding to the interrupt level.
- The address found at the vector is the address of the interrupt service
routine (ISR).
- The ISR polls all the devices to find the device that caused the
interrupt. This is accomplished by checking the interrupt status registers
on the devices that could have triggered the interrupt.
- Once the device is located, control is transferred to the handler specific
to the interrupting device.
- After the device specific ISR routine has performed its job, the ISR
executes the "return from interrupt" instruction.
- Execution of the "return from interrupt" instruction results in
restoring the processor state. The processor is restored back to user mode.
Here we describe interrupt handling in a scenario where the hardware does
support identifying the device that initiated the interrupt. In such cases, the
exact source of the interrupt can be identified at hardware level.
- A device asserts the interrupt signal at a hardwired interrupt level.
- The processor registers the interrupt and waits to finish the current
instruction execution.
- Once the current instruction execution is completed, the processor
initiates the interrupt handling by saving the current register contents on
the stack.
- The processor then switches to supervisor mode and initiates an interrupt
acknowledge cycle.
- The interrupting device responds to the interrupt acknowledge cycle with
the vector number for the interrupt.
- Processor uses the vector number obtained above and fetches the vector.
- The address found at the vector is the address of the interrupt service
routine (ISR) for the interrupting device.
- After the ISR routine has performed its job, the ISR executes the
"return from interrupt" instruction.
- Execution of the "return from interrupt" instruction results in
restoring the processor state. The processor is restored back to user mode.
Many times software designers have to work with data structures that are
shared with interrupts or DMA devices. This requires performing atomic updates
to the shared critical regions.
Synchronization With Interrupts
When a data structure is shared with an ISR, disabling the interrupt to
execute the critical region updates is a good technique. Keep in mind that
disabling of interrupts should be restricted to only the code that updates the
critical region. Keeping the interrupts disabled for a long time will increase
the interrupt latency.
Another option is to make use of the fact that interrupts are processed at
instruction boundaries. A single instruction that performs read as well as write
could be used to perform an atomic transaction. For example, if your processor
supports direct memory increment, you could increment a shared semaphore without
disabling interrupts.
Synchronization With DMA
Sharing data structures with a DMA device is tricky. The processor can
initiate a DMA operation at a bus cycle boundary. This means that a new DMA
operation can be started in the middle of an instruction execution (Keep in mind
that an instruction execution involves multiple bus cycles).
The best mechanism to perform critical region updates is to use the read-modify-write
bus cycle. With this instruction, atomic updates can be made to critical
regions as the read and write are glued together in a special bus cycle.
Another option is to disable DMA operation. Extreme caution should be used
when employing these techniques.
- Some processors also support disabling DMA operations by using locked bus
cycles. The processor could execute lock instruction to disable external bus
grants. When critical region updates have been completed, the unlock
instruction is used to allow bus grants.
- Another mechanism to prevent DMA might be to temporarily disable the
device that will perform DMA. For example, if the DMA operations are being
performed by an Ethernet controller, disabling the Ethernet controller will
make sure no DMA operations are started when a critical region update is
being made.
|