传世哥窑窑址在何处?
哥窑,是我国古代著名的瓷窑。它的名字为古陶瓷爱好者所熟知,而研究者则更是对它备加关注。在我国数千年陶瓷发展历史上,哥窑曾在其中占有光辉灿烂的一页,被列为制瓷业兴盛时期的宋代五大名窑之一。但是它的烧瓷遗址迄今尚未发现,人们对于这一问题有着不同的看法,它成了中国陶瓷史上引人注目的悬案。
哥窑瓷器是古代中国瓷器中的一种很有特色的品种,它以器身满布 大小开片为主要特征。哥窑瓷器胎厚釉润,制作规整,釉色主要有灰青、浅青、米黄等。大小开片,大呈深褐色,小呈米黄色,两种纹片纵横交织,颇有奇趣,被人冠之以“金丝铁线”和“文武片”等美称。哥窑瓷器素雅古朴,庄重不俗,甚合宋代崇尚典雅的风气,因而深受上层社会的欢迎,是专供宫禁内苑、帝王之家欣赏的高级艺术品。由于哥窑瓷器具有高度的艺术魅力和美好的声誉,后世竭力加以仿制,所仿者几使人难辨真赝。近世的古董商也不惜出高价收购这种格调高雅的精美瓷器。
哥窑瓷器留传于世并不多,按照粗略的估计,大约有数十件,分藏于北京故宫博物院、上海博物馆、台湾省故宫博物院,一部分已流落至国外。这些传世哥窑瓷器的产地在什么地方?下面有一段传说。 相传在南宋时期,处州(今浙江省龙泉县)地方有章姓兄弟二人,兄名生一,弟名生二,各自在当地经营一瓷窑。章生一所烧的瓷器以开片纹为主要特征,章生二则烧青釉瓷器(烧窑处即宋代著名的青瓷产地——龙泉窑)。 以后人们习惯上把章生一所烧之窑称为“哥窑”,而把章生二所烧之窑称为“弟窑”或“生二窑”。久而久之哥窑之名广传,远近皆知,蜚声海内。从这段传说看,哥窑窑址在龙泉几乎是无庸置疑的了。因此,多少年来人们一直把传世的那些哥窑瓷器当作章生一在龙泉烧造的产品。直到解放以后,特别是近一二十年,对哥窑的研究才有了突破。近年来,一些专家的新见解更引起了国内外陶瓷研究者的瞩目。 从文献上看,关于哥窑的记载最早是明初宣德年间,据《宣德鼎彝谱》云:“内库所藏:柴、汝、官、哥、钧、定。”这是哥窑之名的缘起。嗣后,明代人曹昭在《格古要论》里考证古器时说:“旧哥窑出(原意为出产于某地,但产地待考,作者未及补),色青浓淡不一。……成群队者,是元末新烧,土脉粗躁,色亦不好。”此段文字说明哥窑有新旧之分,作者认为新哥窑是元末新烧的,可见哥窑的烧瓷下限可到元末甚至明初,比《格古要论》晚约一个世纪的《浙江通志》记载:“处州……县南七十里曰琉华山”,“山下即琉田……相传旧有章生一、二兄弟,二人未详何时人,至琉田窑烧青器,粹美冠绝当世,兄曰哥窑,弟曰生二窑。”这就是前面那段传说的雏形,这里作者搞不清章姓兄弟是什么时代人。但到了明后期嘉靖四十五年,《七修类稿续编》的作者指出:“哥窑与龙泉窑皆出处州龙泉县,南宋时有章生一、章生二各主一窑。”这样逐渐形成了前面那段比较完整的传说,而以后的史料,大都引自此处。由此可见,关于哥窑的文献和传说是不完整的,因而也不能以此为据,但有一点是一致的,即哥窑窑址在龙泉。 既然有窑址,那么一切都解决了?事实并非如此简单。1960年,浙江省文物管理委员会对龙泉县的大窑、金村遗址进行了发掘。在大窑和溪口等五处窑址发现了一种黑胎青瓷,器身带开片,其特征与文献中的哥窑特征酷似,但同各大博物馆收藏的那种传世的哥窑瓷器截然不同,这说明传世哥窑瓷器不是在龙泉烧造的。据此,中国科学院上海硅酸盐研究所对龙泉黑胎青瓷、景德镇仿哥窑等瓷片进行了化验、分析,结论是:“传世宋哥窑(器)不在龙泉烧造之说是可以接受的,龙泉黑胎青瓷可能就是正统的哥窑这种说法也是有相当根据的”。这就清楚地表明了文献里所谓的哥窑是龙泉窑的哥窑,而不是烧造传世瓷器的哥窑。这样,烧造传世瓷器的哥窑在哪里就成了一个新的、有争议的问题。有人认为可能在江西景德镇,因为明清两代景德镇仿哥瓷烧得很成功,但没有迹象表明宋元时的传世哥窑在那里。也有人判断也许在江西吉安即宋代吉州窑的产地,因为明人曹昭《格古要论》里提到该地有一个“碎器窑”,但迄今未发现。在另一个明代人高濂的《遵生八笺》里谈到哥窑取瓷土于杭州凤凰山下,似是指窑在该地,有人以此为据,怀疑窑在杭州。说法颇多,但没有人能证实,也没有新的发现,因而确实是一个谜。这个谜,看来只有指望以后的考古新发现了。(陆明华) Song Dynasty Ge Kiln porcelain mysteriesThere is a porcelain, it’s beautiful wonderment, its legendary name, it is called – Ge. The earliest documented on Ge visible in the Ming Dynasty “Xuande Ding Yi spectrum”: “hidden within the library firewood, Ru, officer, brother, Jun, fixed the kiln utensils ……”, due to be transferred to the Five firewood burned in the kiln; Later it listed only five famous kilns, that officer, brother, Ru, fixed, Jun. The passage of time away too much, so when we were able to antiques handed down from those who faint glimpse of a star the slightest history, the kind of gaze always seems to be particularly valuable. In popular since the Song Dynasty porcelain, Ge ware porcelain probably cause people to be up in a reverie. Beijing Palace Museum and Taipei Palace Museum collection of ancient palace collection Geyao porcelains, plus the diaspora at home and abroad, are known to have documented, but also the total number of about 300, so that the individual Ge broken porcelain pieces are also deemed is his treasure, such as the Beijing Palace Museum collection Geyao round bottom wash damaged fragments. Ge Kiln porcelain rare, is evident. The passage of time allows Geyao firing process become difficult to crack the mystery, leaving only that a lengthy pieces of porcelain through time and space, cause people to unlimited questioning and conjecture. Mystery Geyao name Ge exactly where the kiln, still no definite conclusion. The origin of the name on Ge, there are two different versions. Ge in the name of the literature failed to be found in the Song Dynasty, the Yuan Dynasty “to integrity in mind,” beginning with Ge argument. The Qing Xu Heng in the “porcelain drinking stream Zhai said,” explained: “Ge, Song Longquan County State Department, Triumph brothers were good rule of Porcelain and brother were born one, then do it Dubbed Ge, the Taizhi fine, Kennedy, weight, multiple cracks, which opens the piece too. “That is to say, the Southern Song Dynasty Longquan County, State Department (now part of Zhejiang province) has two brothers surnamed Zhang in porcelain for the industry, his brother Zhang born a burning tire fine quality porcelain to Kennedy, break off pieces for the characteristics, which is named Ge. And his brother fired porcelain called “brother kiln”, also called Longquan kilns. Since 1956 archaeological excavations in Longquan County, which found a black tire Celadon, Longquan celadon filaments film grain. But people still have doubts about this argument, because the Song Dynasty Ge Kiln handed down, carving and polishing shape much imitation bronze, porcelain style is like for the court, should logically from kiln; while above, chapter apparently born a Geyao just folk private kilns. Another argument is that the Southern Song Dynasty emperor Ge southern breeding ground, the imitation of the shape of its Huangxiong kiln built in the Southern Song Dynasty Guan Kiln Jiangnan established, because it is the way to learn his brother built the kiln, so called “brother kiln. ” Zhao Ming Cao’s “ancient to be on the grid” in the records and said: “My brother kiln, kiln old brother out, color green shades, some iron foot purple mouth …… this is also rare.” This means that my brother kiln porcelain, the Southern Song Dynasty kilns produced brother, blue glazed objects on the opening lines of varying shades of film, there are also features purple iron foot, and today has rarely met. Historical records, Song Gao had “hit it relics in Beijing, located inside the kiln at Shuji, building green,” on Gaozong modeled brother porcelain firing Queen style porcelain, folk have to put the image of this style kiln kiln Bianjing called brother kiln. Five Famous Kilns in Song Dynasty The Song Dynasty (960-1279) witnessed booming development of Chinese porcelain making crafts. and porcelain making saw big achievements in terms of types. styles and firing techniques. Five kilns became outstanding during this period. namely
The Ru Kiln was established in 1107 AD, in the Northern Song Dynasty. Its location was believed to be in the Linru County, Henan Province. However, the archeologist never found the exact location of the kiln after many year's research. In 1986, the ruins of the kiln was found in the neighboring Baofeng County. 22 porcelain vessels were excavated, thus answered the question that confused the archeologist for many years. In the Song Dynasty, the Baofeng County was called Ruzhou, so the kiln was named as Ru Kiln. Ru Kiln was built up to produce royal utilities only. Its design was affected by another big kiln the Yue Kiln in South China. Therefore the Ru Kiln produced celadon as its major product. The roughcast, glaze and design were all exquisite and well controlled, demonstrating a very high standard of porcelain producing. The cast of the Ru Kiln porcelains were very smooth, fully covered by bluish glaze, with some tiny fine crackles. The Ru Kiln made utilities such as bowls, plates, bottles, basins and boxes. It was very difficult and complicated to made a perfect Ru porcelain, since small pieces were easier to control, the Ru Kiln almost never produce vessels larger than 30cm diameter. Usually it was between 10 -16 cm.
The Ru Kiln porcelains have a special sapphire like clear blue. Many collectors call it "the blue sky after shower". This is an important character of the Ru porcelains.
Production sites of Ding kilns were found in present day Quyang County, Hebei Province. Quyang County back in the Song Dynasty was within the Dingzhou region, hence the name Ding kilns. The history of the Ding kilns can be traced back based on unearthed specimens. There were white porcelains being made here as early as the Tang Dynasty; by the Five Dynasties Period, the porcelain business here was already booming. After the Northern Song Dynasty, Ding kilns were famous for its off-white glazes and other areas all strove to imitate Ding porcelain, which became the standard of white porcelain in China. Aside from white porcelain, the Ding kilns also produced black, crimson, and green glazed porcelain. Its technology and varieties in glaze colors were astonishing. Early Ding porcelain was single colored with little or no decoration; by late-northern Song Dynasty however, there would be exquisite patterns on porcelain ware, which were engraved, etched or imprinted. The patterns were precisely laid out, with a clear sense of sections and layers; lines were clear and organized into loose and dense areas. Popular motifs included water waves, swimming fish, land animals, birds, flowers, and playful children. Peonies, lotuses, and pomegranates and so on were the most common floral motifs. Engraved floral décor was the principal way of ornamentation in early Song porcelain. Once the technique caught on, it was combined with comb-etched images as another form of ornamentation. For example, at the center part of a flare-lip dish, the image of a flower was first carved, then with a fine-toothed comb, the area within the outlines of the leaves were comb-etched, leaving parallel lines that represent veins of the leaves. The most popular motifs done in this technique were the lotus, peony and so on. Engravings usually relied on bamboo chips and knives, while comb-etchings relied on a tool similar in shape to a comb to leave orderly patterns on the body. The combined result was commonly referred to as bamboo outlines with brushed patters, with lines that were tidy and natural. Imprinted patterns on Ding porcelain first appeared in mid-northern Song Dynasty, and matured late in the dynasty. the patterned décor was often place on the insides of plates and bowls. To make imprinted patterns, it would require a mold with engraved patterns, which is pressed onto the not yet dried surface of the clay body. Most often, the imprinted image would be a positive image and would have added thickness and can create a very special effect of depth when light strikes the object. The motifs and designs were normally borrowed from silk tapestry or gold and silverware produced in the Dingzhou area. Therefore, imprinted motifs on Ding porcelain have appeared to be mature in style right from the start, with very high artistic merits. It had quite an effect on imprinted designs of latter generations.
Among the five great kilns of the
Song Dynasty, only the Ding kilns produced white porcelain, and it was quite
famous during its time. It was for a time offered as tribute to the imperial
families but was then discontinued for an unclear cause. The official given
reason was that Ding porcelain had unglazed parts. This was because Ding
porcelain was produced through upside-down firing, and had no glaze at its
mouth. However, Ding porcelain often had extensive gold, silver and copper edged
around the unglazed rim. Therefore, some people believe that the real reason for
discontinuing imperial use of Ding porcelain was not because of the unglazed
areas. Instead, it was attributed to the aesthetic preferences of its times. The
white of the Ding porcelain was turbid, opaque and bland. In order to counter
such a drawback, most Ding wares were decorated with imprinted or engraved
patterns. When compared to porcelain of the Ge, Imperial, Fu and Jun kilns, Ding
porcelain contained more synthetic feature, which fell short of achieving the
ideals of natural and subtle beauty in the Song Dynasty. for this reason, Ding
porcelain did not quite capture the interest of the literati class, and may have
been considered objects of somewhat vulgar taste and style Ru Kiln Ware The Ru Kiln was established in 1107 AD, during the Northern Song Dynasty (960-1127) to produce items only for imperial use. The kiln was in production during the reigns of Emperors Huizong (1100-1126) and Qinzong (1126-1127), until 1127 when production was halted with the defeat of the Northern Song Dynasty by the Jin Dynasty. Almost immediately the Ru Kiln Ware became incredibly valuable. The kiln was located in Henan Province’s Ruzhou County, which is where the kiln got its name.
When the discovery of the Ru Kiln
was announced in 1987, it was quickly understood that it was the most important
archaeological even in modern Chinese ceramics history. Excavations continued
for many years and 15 kiln furnaces, kiln equipment, and two workshops were
uncovered. It was also discovered that some Ru Kiln Ware was pea green in color
and incised and had molded designs. These were not known to exist before the
discovery of the kiln. with the main kiln site located in Yuxian County of Central China's Henan Province, constituted a famous school of porcelain manufacture that flourished in the Song Dynasty (960-1279). Various duplicates of the famous Jun ware appeared throughout different dynasties. The best (and also largest in scale) porcelain vessels were unearthed from the Bagua Cave kiln site. Kiln sites were fairly dense in the vicinity of Shenhou, while various places in Yuxian County produced numerous ceramic products.
Sites of large-scale porcelain kilns were excavated at Bagua Cave in Yuxian County. The unearthed products and bronze coins inscribed with the reigns of emperors have shown that after a long development in the mid Northern Song period, Jun ware reached a production peak in the late Northern Song Dynasty, when excellent quality ware was produced, though this quality was maintained for but a relatively short period. After the Jin Dynasty (1115-1234) conquered the Northern Song Dynasty (960-1127), the manufacture of Jun ware continued in and around Henan. Wars became less frequent after the Dading reign (1184) in the Jin Dynasty and society was fairly stable, enabling the economy to recover to some degree from the ravages of war. This development included Jun ware, whose production expanded up until the Yuan Dynasty (1271-1368). Jun ware was outstanding for the firing of its copper-red glaze, which contained large amounts of copper oxides. Fired with reduction (cooler) flame, the copper in the glaze became colloid (semi fluid) particles at high temperatures, and an iridescent (unstably bright) red furnace-transmutation color (color changed by furnace heat) appeared on the glaze surface. Jun ware came in a big variety of glaze colors, such as sky-blue and moon-white interspersed with rose purple. With a thick lustrous glaze and ritualistic in shape, it is a gem in Song art porcelain history. In the late Northern Song
Dynasty, Emperor Huizong ordered Jun and other kilns to make flower pots and
other porcelain vessels for the imperial court; complete sets of these in
varying sizes and shapes, with serial numbers inscribed on the bottom, have been
unearthed at the Bagua Cave kiln site in Yuxian County. The original Ge Kiln was reportedly located in Longquan County of East China'sZhejiang Province, but so far no site has been discovered. It was said that two brothers, the elder named Zhang Sheng the First, and the younger Zhang Sheng the Second, were skilled at porcelain making, with their wares greatly acclaimed among the people. According to theAnnals of Chuzhou Prefecture, the vessels made by Zhang Sheng the First were called Ge (elder brother) ware, known from the many specimens handed down. These vessels were light in
color: powder blue, pale white, or the yellow of parched rice. They had not the
kingfisher green of the Longquan ware glaze. Rather, the glaze of Ge ware was
crackled, with large and small crackles interspersed. The large crackles
(decoration patterns of very small surface cracks) were jet-black and the small
ones brownish yellow, leading to the popular description of, "Golden wires and
iron threads." Crackles appeared because the ingredients of the paste and glaze had different compositions and so expanded to different degrees during firing and cooling. Accidental at first, the crackles were later intended, as it was thought they gave the vessels a touch of classic elegance. And so this original blemish became a special feature of Ge ware, with succeeding generations of potters vying in its imitation -- consciously arranging the grains of the ingredients in a given direction to produce crystals that resulted in crackles of varying sizes on the vessels' surface. Ge ware paste was iron black, with its objects being mainly censers, vases, and bowls. Years of research prove that Ge ware celadon was a special variety of Longquan celadon influenced by Southern Song Guan ware and it was given its present name Ge ware by later generations. The story of the Zhang brothers directing kilns was handed down from theYuan Dynasty(1279-1368) but has not been substantiated by archaeological discoveries. |
|