SCI修改回复的原则

　　1. 不要让问题影响你的情绪;

　　2. 认真对待每一个问题，读懂每个问题，确定回答策略;

　　3. 回答策略就是坚持审稿人是对的;

　　4. 对于审稿人提出的补充实验，尽可能照办;

　　5. 对于有争议的问题，要不卑不亢地回答。

　　三步走策略：

　　1. 引用文献

　　2. 承诺未来

　　3. 进行讨论

　　十一项注意：

　　问题的分类和回答策略

　　1. 轮子的问题：分以下五步进行：

　　感谢提问;同意观点;承认错误;综述别人成果;承诺未来。

　　如：

　　The reviewer has made a very good point here. Our original description has been misleading, and we have made correction in this revision as requested. I noticed that in previous studies, [罗列文献]。

　　This is a constructive suggestion by the reviewers. We have added these contents in the Discussion sector of this revision, which will help readers to better understand this article.

　　2.哲学家的问题：we will be very glad if the reviewer can specify his questions and give us a list of questions, which will definitely help us to improve our manuscript.

　　3.完美主义问题: we also mentioned in the Discussion section.

　　4.外行的问题: we are sorry that we failed to make us clearly…

　　5.一般性学术问题

　　6.重大学术问题: 当遇到“exceptionally immature”/ “severe limitations”的评价时，建议按要求修改后再改投其它杂志。

　　7.要求补充实验：(条件允许，最好补充)

　　8.写作，格式，语言等方面

　　9.伦理问题

　　10.不该出现的问题：I am sorry for this kind of mistakes to eliminate such kind of problems.

　　11.科研不端：对于一稿想同时投英文和中文期刊，必须在cover letter中告知杂志社此事，做到透明化，才能避免纠纷。