|
4月28日，外交部发言人耿爽主持外交部例行记者会。 路透社记者提问称，澳大利亚日前召见中国驻澳大使，要求其解释中方之前就澳大利亚推动开展病毒溯源和扩散国际调查作出的“经济胁迫”威胁。中方是否有限制对澳贸易的正式计划？对澳大利亚外交部称中方行为构成“经济胁迫”有何回应？ 耿爽表示： I suggest you carefully read the full text of Ambassador Cheng's interview. What he said was about the concerns that the Australian side's erroneous words and deeds recently have upset the Chinese people and that they may impact bilateral relations. Is there any problem with that? How could it have anything to do with "economic coercion"? Now the world economy is bearing the brunt of COVID-19 pandemic. China stands ready to work with other countries with stronger cooperation and mutual assistance through difficulties and make contributions to the health and wellbeing of all mankind. We also hope other countries will join China in enhancing international cooperation and mutual assistance, rather than say something nice while doing the opposite. 在路透社记者提问后，《澳大利亚人报》记者就“中国人对澳大利亚的态度”、“中方为何反对澳方提出的对病毒源头进行独立调查”等问题进行了多次追问，而外交部发言人耿爽也针对该记者的六连问见招拆招，做出了犀利反问与精彩回答。 《澳大利亚人报》记者追问： I have read the full transcript of the Ambassador's interview. He says that the Chinese public is frustrated, dismayed and disappointed with what Australia is doing now. What he said was the Chinese public, not the government. I would like to know which Chinese people? I'm an Australian in Beijing and I've never heard anyone criticizing Australia like that except from the foreign ministry or from your ambassador in Canberra. 耿爽回答： You haven't heard any of that? Do you want to hear some now? 
I suggest you read Chinese people's comments on the Internet. Many people criticize China's internet service as "not free and not open", but you can go online and take a look at what the general public in China have said about China-Australia relations and about Australia's recent comments. 《澳大利亚人报》记者追问： I don't trust these online comments. They can be made up. They can be manufactured. Have you heard anyone in the real world express upset outside of the foreign ministry or the Chinese embassy in Canberra? 耿爽反问： You don't think the online comments are real? Then who made these comments? Robots? If you haven't heard that in the real world, it's because you are not reaching out to that many people. As a journalist stationed in China, you will need to get a deeper understanding of the Chinese society and what's on the mind of the Chinese people. That's a premise for accurate, thorough and objective reports on China. 《澳大利亚人报》记者追问 The Chinese ambassador to Australia said in the interview that maybe people in China will think why should we go to such a country that is not so friendly to China. As the foreign ministry of China, have you thought of the reverse? Is the foreign ministry concerned at all that Australian people and other people around the world might think that China is not so friendly, even hostile? 耿爽反问： I wonder how you drew this conclusion that China is not so friendly? By the way, you said last week that your wife couldn't come back to China. I sympathize with you and hope you can get together as soon as possible. However, it's not fair to conclude that China is not friendly to foreigners just because of some personal matters. 《澳大利亚人报》记者追问 That's very kind. Are you concerned that people may think China is not so friendly, and even hostile, when Chinese ambassadors like the ambassador in Canberra tell off countries they are in when they just make a reasonable proposal? 耿爽： Like I said, the Chinese ambassador's remarks were to express concerns about the Chinese people's dissatisfaction and possible impacts on China-Australia relations caused by some wrong words and deeds of the Australian side. As a Chinese ambassador, of course he has the right to express such concerns. I wonder how you drew the conclusion of China being not friendly based on the ambassador's remarks. I haven't heard that from anyone else before. I suggest you get a deeper understanding of China and I'm afraid you may have some biases to overcome in this process. We could have more discussions on this issue someday if necessary. That said, as a journalist stationed in China, I think you can feel that China is open and opening up even wider to other countries. Our government and people have been embracing and deeply integrated into the world. So I don't know how you came to that conclusion. 《澳大利亚人报》记者追问： The whole origin of the ambassador's unhappiness is that he's not happy about the Australian government's proposal for an independent inquiry. I've heard you say at the press conference last week and the week before that the Chinese government says the origin of the virus is a matter of science. I couldn't agree more. And yet the Chinese government is strongly opposed to a proposal by the Australian government for an independent, objective and scientific review into the origins of the coronavirus. Why is that? 耿爽： Like we said repeatedly, tracing the origin of the virus is a scientific matter, which should be studied by scientific professionals. Politicians shouldn't make wanton comments or political maneuvers. The most important and pressing task for all countries is boosting solidarity, mutual trust and anti-epidemic cooperation. I wonder what's the intention to propose "investigations", demand accountability and even ask for compensation at this particular time. That's why I said it's political manipulation, and I believe all people around the world can see through it. 《澳大利亚人报》记者追问： I know there are voices in America talking about some conspiracy theories. The Australian government's proposal is for an independent scientific evaluation. You said it's a matter for scientists and professionals. That's what the proposal is. It's for scientists and professionals. It's not for politicians to do it. The proposal is for scientists and professionals to inquire to find out where this thing came from so that the international community can better respond to it. 耿爽： You work with an Australian media agency and you have repeatedly claimed you are independent from the Australian government. But it does seem like you were trying very hard to sell the propositions and proposals of the Australian government just now. I wonder what was in your mind. Like what I just said to Reuters, we hope all countries will work with China to promote international cooperation and mutual trust, rather than say something nice while doing the opposite. The Australian government poses itself as high-minded, but based on what we learn, this whole thing is not as simple as it appears to be. I suggest you ask the Australian government the same question: what is their true intention by proposing such an investigation at this particular time? Your doubts can be cast on the Australian government, too. Still, I hope you will be reunited with your wife soon, and hope this pandemic will be defeated at an early date. 长难句： 宾语从句
I suggest you carefully read the full text of Ambassador Cheng's interview. We also hope other countries will join China in enhancing international cooperation and mutual assistance, rather than say something nice while doing the opposite. He says that the Chinese public is frustrated, dismayed and disappointed with what Australia is doing now. I suggest you read Chinese people's comments on the Internet. Many people criticize China's internet service as "not free and not open", but you can go online and take a look at what the general public in China have said about China-Australia relations and about Australia's recent comments. As a journalist stationed in China, you will need to get a deeper understanding of the Chinese society and what's on the mind of the Chinese people. The Chinese ambassador to Australia said in the interview that maybe people in China will think why should we go to such a country that is not so friendly to China. Is the foreign ministry concerned at all that Australian people and other people around the world might think that China is not so friendly, even hostile? I wonder how you drew this conclusion that China is not so friendly? By the way, you said last week that your wife couldn't come back to China. I sympathize with you and hope you can get together as soon as possible. However, it's not fair to conclude that China is not friendly to foreigners just because of some personal matters. Are you concerned that people may think China is not so friendly, and even hostile, when Chinese ambassadors like the ambassador in Canberra tell off countries they are in when they just make a reasonable proposal? I wonder how you drew the conclusion of China being not friendly based on the ambassador's remarks. I suggest you get a deeper understanding of China and I'm afraid you may have some biases to overcome in this process. I think you can feel that China is open and opening up even wider to other countries. I don't know how you came to that conclusion. I've heard you say at the press conference last week and the week before that the Chinese government says the origin of the virus is a matter of science. I wonder what's the intention to propose "investigations", demand accountability and even ask for compensation at this particular time. That's why I said it's political manipulation, and I believe all people around the world can see through it. I know there are voices in America talking about some conspiracy theories. You said it's a matter for scientists and professionals. The proposal is for scientists and professionals to inquire to find out where this thing came from so that the international community can better respond to it. You work with an Australian media agency and you have repeatedly claimed you are independent from the Australian government. I wonder what was in your mind. Like what I just said to Reuters, we hope all countries will work with China to promote international cooperation and mutual trust, rather than say something nice while doing the opposite. The Australian government poses itself as high-minded, but based on what we learn, this whole thing is not as simple as it appears to be. I suggest you ask the Australian government the same question: what is their true intention by proposing such an investigation at this particular time? Still, I hope you will be reunited with your wife soon, and hope this pandemic will be defeated at an early date.
主语从句
What he said was about the concerns that the Australian side's erroneous words and deeds recently have upset the Chinese people and that they may impact bilateral relations. What he said was the Chinese public, not the government.
表语从句 If you haven't heard that in the real world, it's because you are not reaching out to that many people. The whole origin of the ambassador's unhappiness is that he's not happy about the Australian government's proposal for an independent inquiry. That's why I said it's political manipulation, and I believe all people around the world can see through it. That's what the proposal is.
同位语从句 I wonder how you drew this conclusion that China is not so friendly?
定语从句
Like we said repeatedly, tracing the origin of the virus is a scientific matter, which should be studied by scientific professionals.
状语从句
The proposal is for scientists and professionals to inquire to find out where this thing came from so that the international community can better respond to it. The Australian government poses itself as high-minded, but based on what we learn, this whole thing is not as simple as it appears to be.
短语归纳
Now the world economy is bearing the brunt of COVID-19 pandemic. China stands ready to work with other countries with stronger cooperation and mutual assistance through difficulties and make contributions to the health and wellbeing of all mankind. We also hope other countries will join China in enhancing international cooperation and mutual assistance, rather than say something nice while doing the opposite. I don't trust these online comments. They can be made up. As a journalist stationed in China, you will need to get a deeper understanding of the Chinese society and what's on the mind of the Chinese people. I wonder how you drew this conclusion that China is not so friendly? I sympathize with you and hope you can get together as soon as possible. Are you concerned that people may think China is not so friendly, and even hostile, when Chinese ambassadors like the ambassador in Canberra tell off countries they are in when they just make a reasonable proposal? Like I said, the Chinese ambassador's remarks were to express concerns about the Chinese people's dissatisfaction and possible impacts on China-Australia relations caused by some wrong words and deeds of the Australian side. As a Chinese ambassador, of course he has the right to express such concerns. We could have more discussions on this issue someday if necessary. Our government and people have been embracing and deeply integrated into the world. And yet the Chinese government is strongly opposed to a proposal by the Australian government for an independent, objective and scientific review into the origins of the coronavirus. Like we said repeatedly, tracing the origin of the virus is a scientific matter, which should be studied by scientific professionals. I wonder what's the intention to propose "investigations", demand accountability and even ask for compensation at this particular time. That's why I said it's political manipulation, and I believe all people around the world can see through it. You said it's a matter for scientists and professionals. The proposal is for scientists and professionals to inquire to find out where this thing came from so that the international community can better respond to it. But it does seem like you were trying very hard to sell the propositions and proposals of the Australian government just now. Like what I just said to Reuters, we hope all countries will work with China to promote international cooperation and mutual trust, rather than say something nice while doing the opposite.
一匹想要皮鞭的小马
从契科夫的叔叔养猫说起
一篇文章引发的基于阅读教学中的文本解读的思考
【中考备考】基于情境的中考英语完形填空语篇教学的探究及案例
也说学习和教学中的“啐啄同机” 基于“放羊理论”的教学实践-课前篇
禹海军老师“放羊理论”再思考 也说“上工治未病”
英语在线教学存在的问题及改进方案 跟着主席学写英语书信 为什么要背英语？ 如果喜欢，辛苦点击一下文末右下角的“在看”。感谢
|
