分享

柳叶刀:TROPiCS-02研究大结局

 SIBCS 2023-08-24 发布于上海

  对于化疗耐药、内分泌治疗耐药、甚至CDK4/6抑制剂也耐药的激素受体阳性HER2阴性晚期乳腺癌患者,过去几乎已经没有什么治疗方案可选。2022年,TROPiCS-02研究首次证实滋养层细胞表面抗原TROP2抗体缀合药物戈沙妥珠单抗对此类患者有效,可显著改善无进展生存结局。不过,对于患者而言,最大的结局莫过于生死,戈沙妥珠单抗能否显著减少此类患者的总死亡风险

TROPiCS-02 (NCT03901339): Phase 3 Study of Sacituzumab Govitecan (IMMU-132) Versus Treatment of Physician's Choice (TPC) in Subjects With Hormonal Receptor-Positive (HR+) Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Who Have Failed at Least Two Prior Chemotherapy Regimens


  2023年8月23日,创刊200周年之际影响因子已超越美国《新英格兰医学杂志》成为国际四大医学期刊之首的英国《柳叶刀》正刊在线发表美国旧金山加利福尼亚大学、海伦迪勒家族综合癌症中心、哈佛大学医学院、麻省总医院癌症中心、达纳法伯癌症研究院、纽约纪念医院斯隆凯特林癌症中心、康奈尔大学威尔医学院、吉利德科学、德国海德堡大学曼海姆医院、西班牙巴塞罗那国际乳腺癌中心、马德里欧洲大学、马德里大学国庆日医院、巴塞罗那大学医院、英国伦敦大学玛丽王后学院巴特癌症研究所、法国巴黎大学居里研究院、里昂贝拉德癌症中心、里昂癌症研究中心、图卢兹大学克劳迪乌斯·勒戈癌症研究院的TROPiCS-02研究报告,根据TROP2表达水平以及其他因素对总生存等终点进行研究方案预设最终分析

  该国际多中心非盲随机对照三期临床研究于2019年5月30日~2021年4月5日从北美(美国、加拿大)和欧洲(比利时、法国、德国、意大利、荷兰、西班牙、英国)91个中心入组已确诊为激素受体阳性HER2阴性乳腺癌、局部复发无法手术或远处转移、早期或晚期接受过内分泌治疗紫杉类化疗以及CDK4/6抑制剂治疗、晚期接受过2~4种化疗方案的776例患者,筛选出543例患者按1∶1随机分为两组:
  • 戈沙妥珠单抗组272例:每21天的第1天和第8天静脉注射戈沙妥珠单抗10mg/kg进行单药治疗
  • 医师选择化疗组271例:选择艾立布林、长春瑞滨、卡培他滨、吉西他滨其中之一进行单药化疗


  主要研究终点为无进展生存,次要研究终点包括总生存、客观缓解率、患者报告结局。通过分层对数秩检验和多因素比例风险回归对总生存进行比较。通过免疫组织化学法测定肿瘤组织TROP2表达水平。在统计学检验时,如果总生存获益显著,那么随后检验客观缓解率和患者报告结局。

  结果,截至2022年7月1日,中位随访12.5个月(四分位:6.4~18.8),543例患者死亡390例。


  戈沙妥珠单抗组与医师选择化疗组相比:
  • 中位总生存:延长3.2个月(14.4个月比11.2个月,95%置信区间:13.0~15.7、10.1~12.7)
  • 总死亡风险:降低11%(风险比:0.79,95%置信区间:0.65~0.96,P=0.020)
  • 客观缓解率:提高63%(比值比:1.63,95%置信区间:1.03~2.56,P=0.035)
  • 整体健康状况和生活质量恶化时间:中位4.3个月比3.0个月
  • 整体健康状况和生活质量恶化风险:降低25%(风险比:0.75,95%置信区间:0.61~0.92,P=0.0059)
  • 疲劳恶化时间:中位2.2个月比1.4个月
  • 疲劳恶化风险:降低27%(风险比:0.73,95%置信区间:0.60~0.89,P=0.0021)

  根据亚组分析,无论种族、年龄、体力状态评分、乳腺癌转移后内分泌治疗时间长短、乳腺癌转移后化疗方案多少、CDK4/6抑制剂治疗时间长短、TROP2表达水平高低,戈沙妥珠单抗组与医师选择化疗组相比,总死亡风险都降低,尤其对于内脏转移患者。


  戈沙妥珠单抗的安全性与既往研究(包括TROPiCS-02研究首次分析和ASCENT研究)一致,仅1例致命不良事件(中性粒细胞减少性结肠炎所致败血性休克)被确定与戈沙妥珠单抗治疗相关。

  因此,该研究最终分析结果表明,对于化疗、内分泌治疗、CDK4/6抑制剂耐药的激素受体阳性HER2阴性晚期乳腺癌患者,戈沙妥珠单抗单药与单药化疗相比,总生存获益有统计学显著性和临床意义,中位总生存延长3.2个月,安全性可控。这些数据支持戈沙妥珠单抗成为此类患者治疗的新选择。

相关链接

Lancet. 2023 Aug 23. IF: 168.9

Overall survival with sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (TROPiCS-02): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

Hope S Rugo, Aditya Bardia, Frederik Marmé, Javier Cortés, Peter Schmid, Delphine Loirat, Olivier Trédan, Eva Ciruelos, Florence Dalenc, Patricia Gómez Pardo, Komal L Jhaveri, Rosemary Delaney, Theresa Valdez, Hao Wang, Monica Motwani, Oh Kyu Yoon, Wendy Verret, Sara M Tolaney.

University of California San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; International Breast Cancer Centre, Pangaea Oncology, Quiron Group, Barcelona, Spain; Medica Scientia Innovation Research, Barcelona, Spain; Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitari Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cancer Research Centre of Lyon, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

BACKGROUND: Sacituzumab govitecan demonstrated significant progression-free survival benefit over chemotherapy in the phase 3 TROPiCS-02 trial in patients with pretreated, endocrine-resistant hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+ and HER2-) metastatic breast cancer with limited treatment options. Here, we report the protocol-specified final analysis of overall survival and endpoints by trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) expression and other variables.

METHODS: In this randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial, which took place in 91 centres across North America (the USA and Canada) and Europe (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and the UK), patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive sacituzumab govitecan or chemotherapy (eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, or gemcitabine). Patients had confirmed HR+ and HER2- locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic breast cancer and had received at least one previous endocrine therapy, a taxane, and a CDK4/6 inhibitor in any setting and two to four previous chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (previously reported and not included in this analysis), and secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), and patient-reported outcomes. Overall survival was assessed using stratified log-rank tests and Cox regression. Trop-2 expression was assessed in tumour tissue by immunohistochemistry. In the statistical testing hierarchy, ORR and patient-reported outcomes were tested sequentially if overall survival was significant. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03901339.

FINDINGS: At the data cutoff date of July 1, 2022, 543 of 776 screened patients were randomly assigned between May 30, 2019, and April 5, 2021, with 272 patients in the sacituzumab govitecan group and 271 patients in the chemotherapy group. With a 12.5-month (IQR 6.4-18.8) median follow-up, 390 deaths occurred among 543 patients. Overall survival was significantly improved with sacituzumab govitecan versus chemotherapy (median 14.4 months [95% CI 13.0-15.7] vs 11.2 months [10.1-12.7]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96; p=0.020); survival benefit was consistent across Trop-2 expression-level subgroups. ORR was significantly improved with sacituzumab govitecan compared with chemotherapy (57 [21%] patients vs 38 [14%]; odds ratio 1.63 [95% CI 1.03-2.56]; p=0.035), as was time to deterioration of global health status and quality of life (median 4.3 months vs 3.0 months; HR 0.75 [0.61-0.92]; p=0.0059) and fatigue (median 2.2 months vs 1.4 months; HR 0.73 [0.60-0.89]; p=0.0021). The safety profile of sacituzumab govitecan was consistent with previous studies (including the TROPiCS-02 primary analysis and the ASCENT trial). One fatal adverse event (septic shock caused by neutropenic colitis) was determined to be related to sacituzumab govitecan treatment.

INTERPRETATION: Sacituzumab govitecan demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit over chemotherapy, with a 3.2-month median overall survival improvement and a manageable safety profile. These data support sacituzumab govitecan as a new treatment option for patients with pretreated, endocrine-resistant HR+ and HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01245-X

  对此,德国乳腺癌协作组(GBG)发表同期评论:戈沙妥珠单抗治疗激素受体阳性HER2阴性晚期乳腺癌针对全部还是某些?

Lancet. 2023 Aug 23. IF: 168.9

Sacituzumab govitecan in HR+ and HER2- metastatic breast cancer: for all or for some?

Sibylle Loibl, Johannes Holtschmidt.

German Breast Group, Forschungs, Germany; Neu-Isenburg and Centre for Haematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany.

There is an undisputable need for new treatment options in endocrine-resistant hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+ and HER2-) metastatic breast cancer that is resistant to conventional therapies. Expectations concerning effective new agents are high, especially after the successful introduction of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors as first-line and second-line treatments in metastatic breast cancer.

DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01783-X

    转藏 分享 献花(0

    0条评论

    发表

    请遵守用户 评论公约

    类似文章 更多