分享

乳腺癌软脑膜转移放疗后鞘内妥妥

 SIBCS 2024-05-24 发布于上海

  脑膜由内向外分别为软脑膜、蛛网膜、硬脑膜,大约5%的乳腺癌患者发生软脑膜转移,未经治疗中位总生存仅4~6周。软脑膜转移治疗方法较少,主要包括放疗、全身化疗、鞘内(蛛网膜下腔)化疗,经过治疗中位生存也仅2.9~8.8个月。对于HER2阳性乳腺癌软脑膜转移,全身注射曲妥珠单抗难以通过血脑屏障,鞘内注射曲妥珠单抗安全有效,中位总生存可达10.5个月CLEOPATRA研究已经证实,全身注射曲妥珠单抗+帕妥珠单抗显著优于曲妥珠单抗。那么,鞘内注射曲妥珠单抗+帕妥珠单抗对HER2阳性乳腺癌软脑膜转移是否安全有效?


  2024年5月23日,《美国医学会杂志》肿瘤学分册在线发表南佛罗里达大学莫菲特癌症中心、芝加哥西北大学范伯格医学院MCC-20487研究报告,首次探讨了HER2阳性乳腺癌软脑膜转移放疗后鞘内注射曲妥珠单抗+帕妥珠单抗的有效性和安全性。

MCC-20487 (NCT04588545): Radiation Therapy Followed by Intrathecal Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab in HER2+ Breast Leptomeningeal Disease (Official Title: Phase I/II Study of Radiation Therapy Followed by Intrathecal Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab in the Management of HER2+ Breast Leptomeningeal Disease)


  该单中心非随机对照一期临床研究于2020年12月至2023年5月从莫菲特癌症中心入组HER2阳性乳腺癌伴软脑膜转移经磁共振成像或脑脊液分析确定、预计寿命超过8周、左心室射血分数大于50%、卡氏体力状态评分至少60分、器官功能足够、年龄至少18岁女性患者9例,中位年龄51岁。鞘内注射曲妥珠单抗剂量固定为80毫克,鞘内注射帕妥珠单抗剂量递增:10、20、40毫克各1例患者,80毫克6例患者。每个疗程为4周,第1个疗程每周治疗2次,第2个疗程每周治疗1次,此后每2周治疗1次。如果治疗期间全身病变控制而软脑膜转移进展,可以继续使用静脉曲妥珠单抗、帕妥珠单抗或其他HER2靶向药物、激素或全身药物进行治疗。由于没有经过验证的单一工具测量软脑膜转移疗效,故采用既往鞘内注射曲妥珠单抗研究类似方式,通过细胞学、临床和放射学结果进行软脑膜评啶。如果患者已经接受过放疗,并且多学科团队确定不需要额外放疗,那么鞘内注射之前不需要放疗。



  结果,该研究疗法耐受性良好,未发现限制剂量递增的毒性反应,故将二期研究剂量确定为80毫克

  至少部分归因于研究疗法的毒性反应包括:1级疲劳2例、2级疲劳1例、1级头痛2例,1级四肢疼痛、恶心、感觉异常、关节疼痛各1例2例患者出现皮下植入式鞘内注射装置感染,已将其移除并接受抗生素治疗;第1例患者于第1个疗程后出现感染,并于治疗中断3个月后恢复研究治疗;第2例患者于治疗开始后约24个月出现感染,并于这24个月内注意到软脑膜转移稳定后决定停止治疗。

  目前为止,中位随访10.2个月
  • 总生存:尚未达到中位(95%置信区间:3.4~未达到)
  • 12个月总生存率:86%
  • 无进展生存:尚未达到中位(95%置信区间:3.3~未达到)
  • 12个月无进展生存率:76%

  最佳软脑膜缓解:
  • 2例患者(22%)完全缓解
  • 3例患者(33%)部分缓解
  • 4例患者(44%)病变稳定  

  6例患者继续接受研究疗法。

  因此,该非随机对照一期临床研究结果表明,放疗后鞘内注射曲妥珠单抗+帕妥珠单抗治疗HER2阳性乳腺癌软脑膜转移患者耐受性良好,未发现限制剂量递增的毒性反应,二期临床研究推荐剂量为帕妥珠单抗80毫克和曲妥珠单抗80毫克。软脑膜缓解率令人鼓舞总生存率高于历史对照组参与者观察结果。由于一期临床研究观察到足够的安全性,二期临床研究目前开始入组评定总生存。

相关链接


JAMA Oncol. 2024 May 23. IF: 28.4

Radiation Therapy Followed by Intrathecal Trastuzumab-Pertuzumab for ERBB2-Positive Breast Leptomeningeal Disease: A Phase 1 Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Ahmed KA, Kumthekar PU, Pina Y, Kim Y, Vogelbaum MA, Han HS, Forsyth PA.

Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida; Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.

Trastuzumab has been studied in the management of ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive leptomeningeal disease (LMD) via intrathecal delivery. In a previous phase 1/2 study, Kumthekar et al assessed the safety and efficacy of intrathecal trastuzumab in the management of ERBB2-positive LMD. Trastuzumab and pertuzumab delivered systemically with chemotherapy demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) over chemotherapy with trastuzumab alone in patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer.

Radiation therapy (RT) has a well-defined role in symptom control for LMD and may improve the flow of intrathecal therapies through the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In this phase 1 study, we assessed the safety of RT with intrathecal trastuzumab (80 mg) combined with pertuzumab.

METHODS

The Moffitt Cancer Center Institutional Review Board approved this nonrandomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT04588545). Participants provided informed consent. The study followed the CONSORT reporting guideline.

Patients were enrolled between December 2020 and May 2023. A modified toxicity probability interval (mTPI-2) or keyboard design was used to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Key eligibility criteria included ERBB2-positive breast cancer with LMD identified with magnetic resonance imaging or CSF analysis, adults' age (≥18 years), life expectancy longer than 8 weeks, left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 50%, Karnofsky Performance Status of 60 or greater, and adequate organ function. Patients could continue treatment with intravenous trastuzumab, pertuzumab, or other ERBB2-directed, hormonal, or systemic agents if controlling systemic disease and LMD developed while receiving these therapies.

The intrathecal trastuzumab dose was fixed at 80 mg with a dose escalation of intrathecal pertuzumab. Each cycle was 4 weeks with treatment twice-weekly in cycle 1, weekly in cycle 2, and every 2 weeks thereafter. Because there is no single validated tool to measure response in LMD, primary leptomeningeal assessment was made in a similar fashion to the previous study of intrathecal trastuzumab using cytologic, clinical, and radiographic findings. Radiation therapy was not required per study protocol if patients had received prior RT and the multidisciplinary team determined that additional RT was not needed. Data analysis was performed using JMP, version 17 (SAS Institute).

RESULTS

This trial included 9 women with a median age of 51 years. Four pertuzumab doses were tested: 10, 20, and 40 mg with 1 patient each and 80 mg with 6 patients. Study therapy was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) identified. The RP2D was determined to be 80 mg using the mTPI-2 design. Toxicities at least partially attributable to study therapy included grade 1 and 2 fatigue (n = 2 and 1), grade 1 headache (n = 2), and grade 1 extremity pain, nausea, paresthesia, and arthralgia (n = 1 each). Two patients developed infected Ommaya reservoirs, which were removed, and were treated with antibiotics. The first patient developed an infection after the first cycle and resumed study treatment after a 3-month treatment break. The second patient developed an infection approximately 24 months after starting treatment and decided to stop therapy after noting stable LMD during these 24 months.

To date, the median follow-up is 10.2 months. Median survival has not been reached (95% CI, 3.4 to not reached), with a 12-month OS of 86%. The best leptomeningeal response was a complete response in 2 patients (22%), partial response in 3 patients (33%), and stable disease in 4 patients (44%). The median PFS has not been reached (95% CI, 3.3 to not reached), with a 12-month PFS of 76%. Six patients continue to receive the study therapy.

DISCUSSION

In this phase 1 nonrandomized controlled trial of RT followed by intrathecal trastuzumab plus pertuzumab for ERBB2-positive breast cancer LMD, the RP2D of pertuzumab was 80 mg with 80 mg of trastuzumab. Additionally, study therapy was well tolerated with no DLTs noted. Finally, intracranial responses appear encouraging, with higher OS than observed for historical control participants. Given the adequate safety profile observed in this phase 1 study, phase 2 is currently open and accruing patients to assess OS.

PMID: 38780965

DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1299

原文共享

    转藏 分享 献花(0

    0条评论

    发表

    请遵守用户 评论公约

    类似文章