配色: 字号:
TOWARDS_A_MISSION_SPIRITUALITY_Bevans
2013-03-25 | 阅:  转:  |  分享 
  
1



TOWARDS?A?MISSION?SPIRITUALITY?



Stephen?Bevans,?SVD?

?

??Introduction:?The?Notion?of?Spirituality?

?

?This?paper?will?focus?on?the?development?of?a?“mission?spirituality.”?As?I?begin,?however,?

I?must?acknowledge?that?to?define?“spirituality”?today?is?a?risky?business.?There?are?in?fact?many?

definitions?of?spirituality,?and?while?all?have?a?lot?in?common?they?differ?among?themselves–

sometimes?very?much.?I’m?sure?not?everyone?will?agree?with?the?definition?or?description?of?

spirituality?out?of?which?I?will?work?here.?Nevertheless,?one?has?to?start?somewhere.?

?As?I?understand?spirituality,?therefore,?I?would?conceive?of?it?as?(1)?a?kind?of?

“framework”?or?“set”?of?values,?symbols,?doctrines,?attitudes?and?practices?which?(2)?persons?or?

a?community?attempt?to?make?their?own?(3)?in?order?to?be?able?to?cope?with?a?particular?

situation,?to?grow?in?the?love?of?God?and?self?transcendence,?and/or?to?accomplish?a?particular?

task?in?life?or?in?the?world.??A?spirituality,?in?other?words,?is?like?a?reservoir?from?which?a?person?

or?a?community?can?draw?to?motivate?action,?to?keep?on?track,?to?bolster?commitment,?to?avoid?

discouragement?when?times?get?rough.?It?is?a?way,?in?still?other?words,?of?tapping?into?the?

infinite,?life‐giving,?refreshing?and?empowering?presence?of?God’s?Spirit,?so?that?people’s?or?a?

community’s?life?can?be?lived?in?grace,?gratitude?and?growth.??

?On?the?one?hand,?everyone?has?a?spirituality–Christian?or?not,?believer?or?not,?pious?or?

not.?A?spirituality–implicit?or?explicit,?cultivated?or?neglected–is?simply?the?way?persons?cope?

with?life.?This?is?true?at?least?as?one?regards?human?existence?from?a?religious?perspective.?

Spiritualities?are?very?personal,?and?everyone?develops?one?in?some?form?or?another.?On?the?

other?hand,?while?allowing?for?individual?differences,?preferences?and?need,?there?are?some?

spiritualities?that?are?systems–particular,?tried‐and‐true?or?freshly?innovative?ways?of?thinking,?

praying,?imagining?and?acting?that?are?developed?to?help?women?and?men?in?particular?

circumstances?find?the?stability?then?need,?the?challenge?they?require,?the?growth?that?they?

seek.?Thus?we?can?speak?about?lay?spirituality,?Precious?Blood?spirituality,?SVD?spirituality,?

Australian?spirituality,?presbyteral?spirituality,?etc.??

?

?Mission?Spirituality?

?

?It?will?be?to?develop?a?spirituality?of?this?latter?type?that?this?essay?will?attempt?to?sketch?

a?framework?of?mission?spirituality.?This?will?be?a?spirituality?for?women?and?men?who?want?to?

grow?and?thrive?in?their?identity?as?people?who?consciously?participate?in?the?mission?of?the?

triune?God,?particularly?insofar?as?such?participation?involves?moving?beyond?their?own?zones?of?

security?in?terms?of?culture,?social?status,?language?and?location.?

?Having?said?this,?however,?I?do?not?believe?that?there?is?a?particular,?“one‐size‐fits‐all”?

mission?spirituality.?Mission?spirituality,?like?mission?itself,?is?always?and?everywhere?a?

contextual?spirituality.?It?will?depend?on?where?a?person?engages?in?mission?(in?affluent?North?

America??in?poor?Latin?America?),?when?she?or?he?engages?in?mission?(as?a?newcomer?in?a?

situation?learning?the?language??as?one?begins?to?withdraw?from?one’s?ministry?situation?in?

retirement?),?one’s?experience?(failure??struggle??identifying?with?the?people?in?a?particular?

culture?),?one’s?theological?perspective?(Rahnerian??Process??focused?on?papal?and?magisterial?

teaching?).?Because?of?this?contextual?reality,?therefore,?what?I?will?sketch?here?will?be?more?of?

a?template?or?check?list?towards?a?particular?spirituality?of?mission.?It?will?include?topics?and?

questions?that?I?believe?every?mission?spirituality?must?address,?but?how?they?will?be?articulated?

will?depend?on?a?variety?of?contextual?factors.?One?might?say?that?I?am?presenting?here?a?

number?of?constants?of?spirituality?that?will?vary?with?every?context.?Readers?may?also?

recognize?that?there?are?issues?and?questions?which?are?not?addressed?here.?They?are?certainly?

free?to?add?these?to?the?template.??

?Our?template?will?have?six?sections?corresponding?to?six?questions:?(1)?What?Scripture?

passage(s)?anchor(s)?one’s?mission?spirituality??(2)?Who?are?(is)?one’s?hero(es)/heroine(s)?as?one?

engages?in?mission??(3)?What?are?the?assets?and?liabilities?of?one’s?own?culture?as?one?crosses?

over?to?another?culture?or?context??(4)?What?is?one’s?basic?theological?perspective?as?one?

ministers?in?a?missionary?situation??(5)?What?is?one’s?experience?as?a?missionary??And?(6)??

what?are?some?practices?in?which?one?might?engage?to?deepen?and?develop?one’s?life?in?

mission??The?meaning?of?each?one?of?these?questions?will?be?explained,?followed?by?a?number?

of?possible?ways?they?might?be?answered.?Again,?the?point?is?not?to?offer?a?complete?mission?

spirituality?here,?but?to?engage?the?reader?in?constructing?or?articulating?her?or?his?own.

1

?

?I.?Scriptural?Foundations?

?

?Every?spirituality?needs?to?be?rooted?in?Scripture,?and?mission?spirituality?is?no?

exception.?One?needs?to?ask?the?question,?therefore,?what?passage(s),?books,?or?themes?of?

Scripture?are?those?that?ground?one’s?missionary?life.??

?There?may,?of?course,?be?some?passages?that?figure?large?at?certain?times?of?one’s?

missionary?service.?One?may?take?strength?and?inspiration,?for?example,?from?some?of?the?great?

vocation?passages?like?Is?6:1‐8,?Jer?1:4‐10,?Mt?4:18‐22?(the?call?of?Peter?and?Andrew,?James?and?

John),?or?Jesus’?invitation?to?Andrew?and?Peter?to?“come?and?see”?in?Jn?1:35‐39.?One?may?also?

be?buoyed?up?in?difficulty?by?Jeremiah’s?sufferings?in?Jer?38,?by?Jesus’?passion?as?a?consequence?

of?his?own?faithful?missionary?witness?to?the?Reign?of?God,?or?by?Paul’s?being?suspect?by?fellow?

Christians?(Acts?9:23‐30)?or?those?whom?he?had?tried?to?evangelize?(e.g.?Acts?9:19b‐25?or?13:50‐

52).??

?There?may?also?be?passages,?however,?that?can?provide?basic?guidance,?inspiration?and?

direction?to?one’s?work?of?crossing?a?culture,?struggling?with?a?language,?being?accepted?by?a?

people,?bonding?with?the?people?among?whom?one?works.?Paul’s?passionate?statement?that?he?

had?become?a?slave?to?all?so?that?he?could?win?more?of?them?to?Christ–indeed,?that?he?had?

become?“all?things?to?all?people,”?so?that?he?might?“by?all?means?save?some”?(see?1Cor?9:19‐23)?

might?serve?as?the?anchor?and?beacon?for?missionaries?in?a?very?different?culture?from?their?



1

I?am?highly?indebted?to?my?friend?and?confrere?Larry?Nemer,?SVD?for?the?development?of?this?paper.?It?

was?in?conversation?with?him?that?the?ideas?in?it?have?taken?shape,?even?though,?of?course,?I?am?responsible?for?its?

concrete?development.?Larry?referred?to?the?groundbreaking?work?on?mission?spirituality?by?Michael?C.?Reilly?

entitled?Spirituality?for?Mission:?Historical,?Theological?and?Cultural?Factors?for?a?Present‐Day?Missionary?

Spirituality?(Maryknoll,?NY:?Orbis?Books,?1978).?

3





own.?One?of?my?own?inspiring?passages?is?that?of?Jn?10:10–the?reason?for?my?ministry,?the?

reason?for?witnessing?to?and?proclaiming?Christ,?is?to?bring,?like?Jesus,?abundant?life?to?the?

world.?One?missionary?in?a?course?on?missionary?spirituality,?my?colleague?Larry?Nemer?relates,?

chose?as?a?foundational?passage?the?story?of?the?wedding?at?Cana?in?the?second?chapter?of?

John’s?gospel:?the?missionary,?this?person?explained,?is?like?water,?but?at?the?word?of?Jesus?and?

in?his?hands?he?or?she?can?be?transformed?into?rich,?joy‐giving?wine.?The?movement?of?the?Acts?

of?the?Apostles?has?always?struck?me?as?a?marvelous?story?of?missionary?spirituality.?It?is?the?

Spirit?(the?primary?agent?of?mission?as?Paul?VI?and?John?Paul?II?have?characterized?her?[see?EN?

75?and?RM?30])?that?challenges,?calls,?pushes?the?church?beyond?the?boundaries?of?their?

understanding?of?the?gospel?to?include?all?peoples?and?all?cultures?in?the?plan?of?salvation.?It?is?

precisely?this?move?of?the?Spirit?that?calls?the?Jesus?Community?to?be?church.?

?There?is?no?“normative”?passage?of?Scripture?for?a?mission?spirituality.?One?reason?for?

this,?as?I’ve?said,?is?the?changing?context?of?one’s?missionary?service.?Another?reason?is?that?the?

entire?body?of?Scripture–Old?and?New?Testaments,?but?especially?the?New–is?the?result?of?

Israel’s?and?the?church’s?reflection?on?the?mission?in?which?they?have?been?called?to?engage.?

The?reader?might?pause?here?and?reflect?on?the?scriptural?foundations?for?her?or?his?own?

missionary?spirituality.?

?

?II.?Missionary?Heroes/Heroines?

?

?Particularly?in?the?last?decade?or?so,?I?have?become?more?and?more?convinced?of?the?

importance?of?the?example?of?the?saints?for?my?own?spiritual?life.?Back?in?1997?I?was?given?an?

autographed?copy?of?Robert?Ellsberg’s?marvelous?All?Saints,?in?which?he?sketches?the?life?of?a?

“saint”?(canonized?or?otherwise,?Christian?or?otherwise)?for?every?day.

2

?For?the?next?ten?years?I?

read?one?of?Ellsberg’s?sketches?every?day;?I?have?not?done?so?for?a?few?years,?moving?on?to?

something?else?for?my?daily?reading.?But?I?know?soon?I?will?go?back?to?it?again.?There?is?

something?powerful?about?being?in?touch?with?that?great?“cloud?of?witnesses”?(Heb?12:1)?of?our?

faith,?and?I?have?been?greatly?nourished?in?my?faith?and?ministry?by?women?and?men?like?John?

Main,?Cardinal?Newman,?Martin?Luther?King,?Jr.,?Mary?Mackillop,?Mary?Ward,?Mahatma?Gandhi?

and?Pandita?Ramabai.?

?A?second?element?of?a?mission?spirituality,?I?believe,?is?a?rootedness?in?those?women?and?

men?who?have?gone?before?us,?set?amazing?examples,?set?standards,?have?helped?us?see?our?

own?humanness?as?we?struggle?and?celebrate?our?participation?in?God’s?mission.?Perhaps?our?

heroes?/?heroines?are?the?founders?of?our?own?missionary?congregation:?Gaspar?del?Bufalo,?in?

your?case?as?Missionaries?of?the?Precious?Blood;?Arnold?Janssen?in?my?own?as?a?Divine?Word?

Missionary.?Perhaps?the?great?missionaries?of?the?past?might?offer?us?guidance?and?inspiration:?

Charles?de?Foucauld,?for?example,?or?Alopen?of?East?Syria,?or?Matteo?Ricci,?or?Mary?Magdelene?

the?Apostle?to?the?Apostles.?Perhaps?it?could?be?missionaries?who?are?also?heroes?and?heroines?

from?our?own?culture:?an?Oscar?Romero?from?Latin?America,?an?Alessandro?Valignano?from?



2

Robert?Ellsberg,?All?Saints:?Daily?Reflections?on?Saints,?Prophets,?and?Witnesses?for?Our?Time?(New?York:?

Crossroad,?1997).?

Italy,?a?Lorenzo?Ruiz?from?the?Philippines,?a?Samuel?Ajajyi?Crowther?from?Nigeria.?Or?perhaps?

our?models?for?mission?are?senior?members?of?our?congregation?with?whom?we?have?worked.?I?

think?of?a?German?SVD?by?the?name?of?Fritz?Scharpf?from?whom?I?learned?so?much?as?a?young?

missionary?in?the?Philippines,?or?my?former?teacher?and?then?colleague?Bernhard?Raas?from?

Switzerland.?

?Once?again,?it?might?be?good?for?the?reader?to?pause?here?and?think?about?the?great?

women?and?men?who?have?influenced?him?or?her?in?their?lives,?who?have?lent?them?inspiration?

or?perhaps?a?sympathetic,?listening?ear.?These?are?the?agents?of?the?Spirit?who?shape?our?

missionary?spirituality.?

?

?III.?Cultural?Assets?and?Liabilities?

?

?We?are?all?unique?individuals,?with?individual?strengths?and?weaknesses,?and?the?

development?and?cultivation?of?a?mission?spirituality?is?to?bolster?and?harness?those?strengths?

and,?if?possible,?blunt?those?weaknesses.?But?we?are?more?than?individuals.?We?are?people?of?a?

particular?time?and?generation.?We?are?shaped?by?our?families?and?by?our?social?class?and?

education.?And?we?are?formed?and?deformed?by?the?culture?in?which?we?find?our?identity.?

?Culture?is?more?than?practices?and?cuisine.?It?is?even?more?than?values?and?attitudes.?

Culture?shapes?the?way?that?we?view–or,?even?better,?construct–our?world?and?our?very?selves.?

Westerners?really?do?see?themselves?first?as?individuals?and?only?subsequently?related?to?

others–even?family.?Latin?Americans,?Africans?and?Asians?(if?I?can?venture?to?say?it)?really?do?not?

see?themselves?first?as?individuals,?but?as?vitally?connected?to?family,?community,?tribe.?What?is?

the?“truth”?here??Is?the?best?form?of?organization?of?society?hierarchical??Or?is?it?democratic??

There?is?no?objective?answer?to?this.??

?Culture?is?not?something?that?we?can?just?take?off?or?put?on.?While?we?can?acculturate?

ourselves?to?various?new?circumstances,?from?the?first?moment?of?our?lives?we?have?been?

enculturated?within?our?own?culture?by?our?family,?our?friends,?our?language,?the?media?which?

surrounds?us.?While?there?are?some?people?who?are?truly?bi‐cultural,?and?some?people?who?do?

manage?to?acculturate?to?a?remarkable?degree,?most?of?us–the?vast?majority?of?us–never?really?

move?out?of?our?original?culture.??

?This?is?why?knowing?who?we?are?as?cultural?beings–as?Italians,?as?Germans,?as?Polish,?as?

U.?S.?Americans,?as?Chileans,?as?Indians–is?so?important.?Each?of?us?brings?a?good?amount?of?

cultural?baggage?to?mission,?and?we?need?to?be?aware?of?how?that?baggage?can?sustain?us?or?

how,?as?Latin?names?baggage,?it?is?impedimenta,?or?a?real?liability?in?our?cross‐cultural?ministry.??

It?is?important?to?understand?and?believe?that?every?culture?is?both?good?and?bad?in?itself,?and?

that?every?culture?offers?opportunities?and?impediments?for?growth?in?another?culture?or?

situation.?No?culture?is?all?good.?No?culture?is?all?bad.??

?As?a?U.?S.?American,?for?example,?I?bring?a?confidence?to?my?ministry?that?is?supported?

by?a?Yankee?“can?do”?attitude.?I?bring?a?sense?of?equality?of?all?peoples?that?can?help?me?build?a?

strong?sense?of?participation?among?the?people?where?I?work.?I?can?easily?work?for?a?strong,?

well‐educated?laity.?As?a?member?of?an?affluent,?powerful?nation?I?have?a?confidence?in?myself?

and?in?my?worldview,?and?a?confidence?in?the?capacities?of?others.?But?such?confidence?and?

surety?can?border?on?the?arrogant.?My?sense?of?equality?and?participation?might?trample?on?

people’s?sensitivities?about?distinct,?important?and?even?sacred?roles?in?a?particular?society.?My?

5





affluence?can?allow?me?to?live?in?a?way?that?actually?separates?me?from?the?people?among?

whom?I?minister.?I?speak?with?a?frankness?that?my?countrymen?admire,?but?which?often?can?be?

insulting?to?the?men?and?women?who?are?my?hosts.?

?So?part?of?my?spirituality?is?to?recognize?who?I?am?as?a?cultural?being?and?make?sure?that?

my?identity?does?not?get?in?the?way?of?God’s?work.?I?can?never?slough?off?that?identity,?but?I?can?

temper?it?quite?a?bit,?and?use?its?positive?aspects?for?good.?Working?with?my?identity?surely?

needs?to?find?itself?into?my?prayer?life;?it?certainly?points?to?ways?that?I?can?practice?real?“self?

denial”?for?the?sake?of?my?ministry.?Once?again,?readers?might?want?to?pause?here?to?take?their?

own?“cultural?inventory.”?

?

?IV.?Theological?Perspectives?

?

?Every?Christian?is?a?theologian.?We?may?not?recognize?that?fact.?We?may?deny?that?we?

think?theologically–that?we?operate?pastorally?rather?than?theologically.?But?that?very?denial?is?

already?a?kind?of?theology?in?itself.?Our?theology?may?be?highly?developed?and?articulated,?or?it?

may?not?be,?but?when?we?understand?that?the?basic?dynamic?of?theologizing?is?simply?part?of?

faith,?we?see?how?inescapable?it?is.?The?mark?of?a?good?pastor,?as?spiritual?writer?Henri?Nouwen?

suggests,?is?how?conscious?she?or?he?is?of?that?dynamic?in?her?or?his?life.

3

?Our?theology?shapes?our?world,?and?provides?the?framework?for?our?spirituality.?

Depending?on?our?understanding?of?God?(judge,?father,?friend,?Mystery),?of?Jesus?(emphasis?on?

his?human?nature,?emphasis?on?his?divine?nature),?of?Mary?(model?disciple,?the?way?to?a?

basically?angry?God),?the?church?(missionary?community,?hierarchical?community)?we?get?

energy?for?ministry,?make?time?for?prayer,?feel?challenged,?intimidated?or?discouraged.??

?Cuban?American?church?historian?Justo?L.?González?speaks?about?three?basic?types?of?

theology?which?can?shape?the?way?we?look?at?the?world?and?do?ministry.

4

?González?speaks?first?

of?“Type?A”?theology?which?has?its?source?in?the?North?African?Roman?lawyer?Tertullian?in?the?

third?century,?and?emphasizes?order?and,?to?a?certain?extent,?law.?God?is?the?lawgiver;?human?

sin?is?disobedience;?Jesus?came?to?bring?the?new?law?and?to?mend?the?gap?between?humanity?

and?God?by?his?obedience?unto?death.?“Type?B”?theology?goes?back?to?Origen,?the?great?scholar?

of?Alexandria?in?Egypt.?Steeped?in?Platonic?philosophy,?the?focus?of?this?type?of?theology?is?the?

mind’s?search?for?the?truth,?experimenting,?even?risking,?using?every?rational?and?cultural?

means?possible.?In?this?type,?God?is?the?One,?the?contemplation?of?whom?humanity?failed?to?

sustain?and?so?needs?to?work?its?way?back?to;?Jesus?is?the?visible?form?of?God,?who?helps?us?

toward?the?goal?of?contemplation.?“Type?C”?theology?has?its?model?in?the?Syrian?bishop?and?

pastor?Irenaeus,?exile?and?missionary?to?the?frontiers?of?the?Roman?Empire?in?Lyons?in?Gaul?

(today’s?France).?This?is?a?pastoral?theology,?rooted?in?experience.?For?Irenaeus,?God?is?the?great?

Shepherd,?who?fondly?cares?for?his?sheep.?God?did?not?make?the?world?perfect,?as?Tertullian?

conceived?of?creation;?nor?did?human?souls?exist?before?creation?in?rapt?contemplation?of?the?



3

See?Henri?Nouwen,?In?the?Name?of?Jesus:?Reflections?on?Christian?Leadership?in?the?Future?(New?York:?

Crossroad,?1989).?

4

Justo?L.?González,?Christian?Thought?Revisited:?Three?Types?of?Theology?(Maryknoll,?NY:?Orbis?Books,?

1999).

Godhead,?only?to?be?distracted?and?fall?into?bodiliness.?Rather,?humanity?was?created?imperfect?

but?eminently?perfectible,?and?Jesus?shows?us?the?way?to?achieve?our?full?identity?as?made?in?

God’s?image?and?likeness.?Each?type?certainly?implies?a?distinct?spirituality:?Type?A?might?

emphasize?a?spirituality?of?strict?discipline;?Type?B?might?conceive?spirituality?as?a?journey?in?

dialogue?with?the?world’s?many?cultures;?Type?C?might?conceive?spirituality?in?terms?of?a?

relationship?that?needs?to?be?cultivated.?My?own?sense?that?Christians?today?still?fall?within?one?

of?these?types,?and?this?does?indeed?affect?and?form?their?spirituality–in?this?case,?how?they?

cope?with?cultural?difference,?with?struggle?and?failure,?with?poverty?or?affluence.?

?As?our?theology?becomes?more?and?more?conscious?and?explicit,?it?can?become?more?

and?more?consistent?and?self‐critical.?This?is?why?the?development?of?a?mission?spirituality?is?so?

closely?connected?with?the?articulation?and?critique?of?one’s?“operative?theology.”?Is?doctrine?

conceived?more?in?the?line?of?Type?A,?and?so?will?breach?no?compromise?as?it?is?proclaimed?

cross‐culturally??Is?God?a?“fellow?sufferer?who?understands,”?as?Alfred?North?Whitehead?once?

put?it?and?which?jibes?with?Irenaeus’?image?of?a?shepherd?God??Is?clarity?on?Jesus’?divinity?not?

all?that?important,?as?we?struggle?to?understand?the?truth?of?Revelation?in?other?religions??What?

kind?of?God?will?understand?our?failures?in?mission??What?kind?of?church?will?encourage?

grassroots?participation??These?are?theological?positions?we?need?to?sort?out?to?help?us?and?

guide?us?in?our?cross‐cultural,?missionary?journey.?

?

?V.?Mission?Experiences?

?

?Once?again,?a?spirituality?is?never?developed?in?the?abstract.?Spirituality?is?always?rooted?

in?concrete?circumstances,?and?concrete?experiences.?If?a?missionary?is?struggling?with?learning?

a?language,?for?example,?his?struggle?will?precipitate?a?certain?kind?of?prayer?(abandonment,?for?

patience),?a?certain?kind?of?asceticism?(study,?humility?in?seeming?like?a?child,?risking?sounding?

awkward,?being?corrected),?the?importance?of?certain?Scripture?passages?(e.g.?Mk?10:13‐16,?

about?becoming?a?little?child;?Jn?3:3?about?being?born?again),?the?significance?of?certain?

missionaries?from?tradition?(Cyril?and?Methodius?and?their?important?translation?of?the?Bible,?

Matteo?Ricci?in?China).?If?a?missionary?has?been?threatened?with?violence?or?death,?or?has?

experienced?failure,?or?has?after?a?long?time?been?finally?accepted?by?the?people,?all?of?these?

experiences?will?shape?one’s?spiritual?life.?

?It?will?be?important?for?missionaries?to?share?their?experiences?so?as?to?be?able?to?be?

aware?of?and?articulate?them?better.?Such?effort?doesn’t?need?to?stop?when?a?missionary?

returns?home.?In?fact,?it?is?crucial?that?her?or?his?experiences?be?told,?and?be?appreciated.?The?

search?for?such?a?support?group?and?regular?attendance?at?its?meetings?will?be?another?way?of?

cultivating?a?mission?spirituality.?

?

?

?VI.?Practices?

?

?Finally,?although?we?have?already?spoken?about?them?above,?a?mission?spirituality?is?

cultivated?by?commitment?to?certain?basic?practices.?Contemporary?theology?has?rediscovered?

7





the?importance?of?frequently?repeated?actions,?actions?which?create?habits.

5

?As?we?commit?

ourselves?to?particular?times?and?forms?of?prayer,?to?ascetical?practices,?to?regular?forms?of?

behavior,?we?are?shaped?by?them?in?overt?and?quite?subtle?ways.?

?Any?kind?of?spirituality?involves?the?practice?of?regular?prayer.?That?goes?without?saying.?

A?mission?spirituality,?however,?would?make?sure?that?the?content?of?that?prayer?is?one?that?

reaches?out?to?all?the?world.?It?might?be?one?that?uses?the?newspaper?as?a?basic?prayerbook.?It?

is?also?a?prayer?that?constantly?calls?to?mind?the?people?whom?are?served,?with?all?their?cultural?

richness.?It?will?be?a?prayer?of?kenosis?or?self‐emptying.?It?will?be?a?prayer?that,?where?

appropriate,?will?use?the?forms?and?content?of?the?other?faiths?among?whom?missionaries?work.?

?A?mission?spirituality?will?practice?a?simplicity?of?life,?in?solidarity?with?the?poor?of?the?

world.?This?may?be?a?real?challenge?to?those?of?us?from?more?affluent?countries,?but?it?is?

essential.?

?The?spirituality?that?we?are?reflecting?on?here?might?practice?two?kinds?of?asceticism.?

One?would?be?a?kind?of?“asceticism?of?risk.”?By?this?I?do?not?mean?putting?oneself?in?undue?

danger,?courting?violence?or?death?for?no?good?reason.?This?may?be?necessary,?certainly?(I?think?

of?missionaries?like?Dorothy?Stang?in?Brazil),?but?this?is?not?what?I?mean?here.?I?mean?rather?a?

practice?of?choosing?to?be?stretched?in?everyday?matters–in?terms?of?language,?perhaps,?or?in?

terms?of?pastoral?assignments,?the?kind?of?things?one?reads.?My?experience?is?that?often?in?

cross‐cultural?situations?we?opt?to?spend?time?with?our?own?cultural?or?language?groups,?in?our?

presbyteries?and?convents,?eating?familiar?food.?This?“asceticism?of?risk”?would?be?an?option?to?

move?beyond?our?comfort?zones–perhaps?not?all?the?time,?but?certainly?some?of?the?time.??

?A?second?kind?of?ascetical?practice?would?be?in?the?area?of?learning?to?listen?rather?than?

to?talk.?This?is?hard?work.?So?often?missionaries?occupy?a?position?of?power?and?prestige.?From?

this?position,?however,?they?often?talk?too?much,?and?too?soon.?A?common?saying?in?the?

Philippines?where?I?worked?as?a?missionary?years?ago?was?that?the?new?missionary?should?not?

say?anything?for?at?least?six?months?to?a?year.?Then?he?might?venture?a?humble?opinion?once?in?

a?while.?But?the?main?thing?is?to?listen,?to?observe.?To?learn?to?really?hear?what?is?being?said–so?

often?“between?the?lines”–to?learn?to?really?see?what?is?going?on?in?an?unfamiliar?context–this?is?

a?major?exercise?in?self?denial.?But?it?will?pay?large?dividends?in?the?future.?

?Finally,?although?I?am?sure?there?are?other?practices?that?missionaries?could?engage?in,?it?

is?important?to?have?a?mentor,?a?spiritual?director,?someone?to?talk?to.?Larry?Nemer?lays?down?

the?qualities?of?such?a?person.?The?mentor/director?should?first?be?one?who?can?listen?with?an?

understanding?heart:?“someone?who?has?time–someone?who?is?willing?to?make?[the?

missionary’s]?experience?the?priority?of?the?moment.”?Second,?the?person?needs?to?have?

wisdom?and?experience,?and?so?able?to?advise?the?missionary?on?the?“right?way”?to?do?

something?or?other?in?a?particular?culture.?Third,?the?director/mentor?should?be?someone?who?

is?“serene,?self‐confident?and?not?surprised?by?anything.”

6

?Our?mission?spirituality?needs?to?be?

developed?in?dialogue,?in?real?honest?and?openness.?



5

See,?for?example,?Miroslav?Volf?and?Dorothy?C.?Bass,?eds.,?Practicing?Theology:?Beliefs?and?Practices?in?

Christian?Life?(Grand?Rapids,?MI:?William?B.?Eerdmans?Publishing?Company,?2002).?

6

Larry?Nemer,?“The?Issues?and?Challenges?of?Cross‐Cultural?Mission?in?Promoting?theMissionofthe

Church,”Unpublishedpresentation.

?It?might?make?sense?at?this?point?for?the?reader?to?reflect?whether?there?might?be?any?

other?practices?that?would?promote?a?spirituality?that?will?sustain?and?inspire?the?hard?but?

amazing?work?of?mission.?

?

?Conclusion?

?

?What?I?have?tried?to?do?in?these?reflections?is?to?lay?out?a?template?within?which?men?

and?women?in?various?stages?of?missionary?service–preparation,?newly‐arrived,?veteran?

workers,?those?who?have?returned?home?or?who?are?retired–can?cultivate?a?spirituality?that?can?

sustain?them,?challenge?them,?console?them,?deepen?them.?Like?spirituality?in?general,?there?is?

not?one?that?works?for?everyone.?And?yet,?any?mission?spirituality?needs?to?be?rooted?in?

Scripture,?in?the?Christian?Tradition,?and?in?human?experience.?As?one?works?to?discover?how?

Scripture?can?inspire,?how?Tradition?can?challenge?and?anchor,?and?how?human?experience?can?

continuously?challenge,?one?will?develop?a?mission?spirituality?suited?for?one’s?particular?

situation,?and?therefore?conforming?to?the?mind?of?Christ.?

?

Discussion?questions?

?

Professor?Bevans?presented?a?template?or?framework?for?a?missionary?spirituality?that?includes:?

?Scriptural?foundation?

?Missionary?heroes?and?heroines?

?Cultural?assets?and?liabilities?

?Theological?perspective?

?Mission?experience?

?Missionary?practice?

We?will?discuss?just?three:?

1)Is?there?a?scripture?passage?that?defines?or?is?foundational?to?your?personal?missionary?

spirituality??

?

2)Who?are?your?missionary?heroes?or?heroines??

?

?

3)Tell?a?story?or?give?an?example?of?your?missionary?practice.?

?

献花(0)
+1
(本文系wangxianglo...首藏)