配色: 字号:
12-Livestock-Streams-Forests 01May2017
2017-05-05 | 阅:  转:  |  分享 
  
01May2017

1

LivestockandStreams

(ReviewCh17sectionsonwaterquality)

LivestockandForests

(Readsections:12-1,12-2,and

12-4.5to4.7)

?Livestockneedwatertosurvive

–cow8-35gallons/day

–Moreinsummer

?Nottoopickywheretheygetit

–Oftentoleratelowqualityanddo

fine,butnitrateandsalinitycan

poseaproblem

–Ozarkwatergenerally“highquality”

Estimateddailywaterconsumption

fordairycows

30-50%dailywaterintakewithinanhaftermilking!

Estimateddailywaterconsumptionfora1500lblactatingcow

producing40to100poundsofmilkdailya.

5Source:NMSUGuideD-107(2002)orOSUANSI-4275

Waterchemistryaffectinggrowth/

productivityofcattle

?Hardness–noeffect

?Salinity–reducedgrowthrateincattledrinking

salinewater(TDS=6000ppm)thatwereunderheat

stressandonpoorfeedqualitycomparedtocattle

drinking“normal”water(TDS=1300ppm).Iffeda

gooddiet–TDShadnoeffect.

?Nitrate–wateranddietmustbeconsidered

together,OKinrangeof0-20ppmNO3-Nifdietis

balancedandlowinNO3

?Sulfate–testtodetermineformofsulfurif>500

ppmsulfate(sulfideformsmosttoxic).6

01May2017

2

Otherfactorsaffectingwaterquality

forlivestock

?Fecalcoliform(<10/100ml)andfecal

streptococci(<30/100ml)foradultcattle,less

forcalves

?Blue-greenalgae–discourageuseofpondswith

alotofalgae(occasionalprobleminfarmponds)

?pH–rangeof6to8ispreferredfordairy

?Temperature–littleeffect(butprefer63-82F)

7

?Streamsareopportunitiesforawater

source(ponds,springs)

?Why?

–plentiful

–fresh/highquality(usually?)

–Free

?nowaterbilltopay

?noelectricity

–Shade/coolingeffect

?Endophyte-infectedtallfescue

Whatstheproblem?

?Soilerosion:

–sensitiveareaalongstream,steepbank,silty

easilyerodedsoil.

–tramplingofbanksgettinginandout

?Waterqualityissue

–Sedimentfromtheerosionanddownstream

impact...

–Directmanure/urineloadinthestream

–Decreasedwoodyvegetationforshading

?Herdhealth

–leginjuriesclimbingin/out

–softhooves

–injuries/deathfallingthroughice,stuckinmud

–spread/pickupwaterbornediseases

?Dairy:mastitis

?LeptospirosisandFusobacterium(foot-rot)

?Publicperception

01May2017

3

?Notjusta“livestockinthestream”problem

contributingtopoorwaterquality!

?Manyothercontributors.

–Youcouldbeacontributor!

–Boating,camping,homessurroundingLakeofthe

Ozarks(SU2009)…

?Landownerrights

–Streamsmoreofanissue

?Whoownsthewater?(seesection15-3.1)

?NoMOlawagainstlivestockinastream

?Somerealizeitisaconcernbutdon’tknow

whattodoaboutit.

What’sthesolution?

1)Limitaccesspointstothestreamorpond.

–Onahighflowstream,hardtomaintain

(stream)

01May2017

4

2)Completelyexcludethelivestockwitha

fenceandprovideanalternativewater

source.

–Ifconcernedaboutfenceinthefloodplainofa

stream

?recommendsmoothelectricwire

–Barbedwirecatchestoomuchdebris,

wipedouteasily

?4wires,posts12’apart

–Electricwire

?1-2wires,posts50’apart

3)Nofence,justanalternativesupplyofwater

outsidethestreamarea.

Virginiaresearchusednofence,justawatertank!

?cattledrankfromtank

92%ofthetime,the

stream8%

?reduceduseofstream

(cooling,shade...)by58%

?fecalbacteriacutby51%,

nitrogenby54%,

phosphorusby81%(Sheffieldetal.1997)

4)Limitthetimetheyspendinthepasturewith

streamorpond.

–Developagrazingsystem

Pipeline

Watertank

Fence

Wherewouldyouputthetanks?

?8pastureoperation

–Rotation

–Ineach“stream”paddock1/8thofthetime(12.5%

each).Thus,87.5%rest.

VERSUS

100%opportunitywhennopasturesubdivisionsand

continuouslygrazed

01May2017

5

Cost

6600’electricfence=$1700

2tanks=$1200

1300’pipeline=$2200

total=$5100

Springs

?Developthemfor

use

–collectionsystem

–pipesystemto

storage(tank)

–overflow

–$500-$1500

Livestock&Forests

Readsections:12-1,12-2,and

12-4.5to4.7

Forests(woods/timber)

?Forest:oneofthebesterosioncontrolcovers

whenproperlymanaged

?LivestockandWoods(i.e.grazedforest)

–Notagoodcombination!

–62millionacresgrazedforestinUS

?Nonfederal

–Definedaswoods/forest/timber,not

shrubby/brushyfields.

61.6millionAin1997,downfrom66.3millionAin1982

Livestockandforests

Concernsanddamages

?Erosionandrunoff

–110Xerosionrate(heavilygrazedvsnongrazed)(MDC

publication:ForestGrazingHurts)

–Oftenonsteeplandscape,nexttoorcontaindrainages

(smallstreams)

–USDAForestServicecanoffertechnicalassistancethrough

EconomicActionPrograms(ForestProductsConservation

andRecycling)

?Livestocktrample/compactsoil

–Mixleaflitterinsoil-decomposesfaster,leavingbaresoil

–Candestroyrootsnearsurface

–Slowgrowth

01May2017

6

–Compactionfromhoovesclosesporesinsoil-

morerunoff/lessinfiltration

–Poorfruitandnutproduction

–Weakenstree,disease/insects/droughty

–Oakssensitive,otherslikehickorymoretolerant

?Canchangeforestcomposition

?Eatundergrowth

–Losenextgenerationoftrees

–Losecoverforwildlife

?Eatacorns:takeawayfromwildlife

Livestockandforests2

?Presenceoflivestockdrivesawaywildlife.

?Poisonousplants(e.g.poisonhemlock)

?Hardtofindlivestockinlargeforest

?Lownutritionalforagevalueinwoods

–20to40Aofgrazedwoods=1Aofgoodgrasspasture

Overall,reducesvalueofthetimberresource

Livestockandforests3

MDCweb-publication

http://mdc.mo.gov/for

est/health/ForestGrazi

ngHurts/

Soilerodedfrom

baseoftreeasa

consequenceof

livestockactivity.

Theimpactonthe

longevityofthe

tree,soil,andwater

qualityareobvious.

BottomLine

?Fencelivestockoutof(mostof)thewoods!

?ImportantBenefits

–Shadeinsummer

–Winterprotection

?Forshadeandwinterprotection,construct

fencestosacrificesmallareasofwoodland

toprovidenecessarycover

献花(0)
+1
(本文系钺鸣心惊首藏)