Are old people really wise?
Scholars tackle murky concept of wisdom
Dreamstime
Let’s think: Is wisdom based on speed of comprehension or judgment?
|
|
| • Most viewed |
![]() |
• Top rated |
![]() |
• Most e-mailed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Robin Lloyd
updated 12:32 p.m. ET Dec. 15, 2008
There is more information than ever at our fingertips, yet we’re none the wiser it seems.
And many old people are wise, as most of them will tell you, but sometimes they can’t remember your name, so how smart is that?
It’s
paradoxes like these that lie at the heart of a new $2 million research
project called Defining Wisdom. Based at the University of Chicago, the
four-year initiative, supported by the Templeton Foundation, has
enlisted 23 scholars ranging from historians to economists to
psychologists to computer scientists to examine the idea of wisdom, with the aim of cultivating it and better understanding its nature.
Definitions
of wisdom are all over the map, even among the funded scholars
interviewed for this story. The communications scientist says wisdom
involves intelligence that is sensitive to the needs of others and
makes a good use of judgment. The computer scientist says wisdom
involves being able to quickly access information from compressed
datasets. And the historian refuses to impose a definition and prefers
to draw it out of the historical contexts she studies.
None
of these three researchers seems to be willing to state whether wisdom
today is greater or less than it used to be, but each is taking a stab
at seeing how wisdom can be understood and measured.
Shaking things up
Earthquakes,
of all things, have offered significant opportunities for society to
figure out what constitutes wisdom, says Barnard College’s Deborah
Coen, who studies the history of science and is interested in wisdom as
the capacity to navigate the rough waters between technical expertise
and what the rest of us know and experience. As such, wisdom is more
than commanding facts, aka knowledge.
Coen’s new research will focus on how lay people’s observations helped scholars and others make sense of earthquakes
during a period from 1857 to 1914. This era was the "hey-day of human
observation of earthquakes," Coen said, in a time before mechanical
detectors of earthquakes were reliable.
Scholars of the time
thought it was imperative to observe earthquakes scientifically, and
relied on eyewitnesses to answer questions about an earthquake’s
duration. At the same time, though, some thinkers ironically believed
that people who experienced earthquakes repeatedly had their
rationality destroyed, leaving them desensitized to the experience and,
in a way, incapable of contributing to higher science or culture.
So
a "science of the lay people" flew in the face of one's fear of the
natural world. A contradiction emerged between common sense and
scientific experts who redefined a modern form of wisdom — in this case
about earthquakes.
Nowadays, lay people are mostly excluded
from the scientific process, but in the late 19th century, there was a
"moment of opportunity for collaboration, negotiation and communication
between experts and lay people. Experts needed lay people’s eyes ears
and hands," Coen said.
|
Click for related content
|
There
is no more or less wisdom today about earthquakes than before, but we
have missed an opportunity, she said, (although a scientist today would
surely claim there is a lot more knowledge about temblors).
"We
have cut off options for ourselves," Coen said. "The technocratic age
has limited the modes of communication between experts and lay people."
CONTINUED
: Assessing a person's wisdom is 'tough'
Compression and computers
Historians
cannot quantify wisdom, Coen says, but that is exactly what Ankur
Gupta, a computer scientist at Butler University in Indiana, is trying
to do. His latest project investigates data compression, which is the
process that takes, for instance, a high-fidelity digital music file
and reduces it to a much smaller mp3-format file that you can play on
your iPod or other music player. The data has been reduced but the file still sounds like the original to most listeners.
"The goal is to try to use data compression as a mathematical measure of wisdom," Gupta said.
Zou
might think that’s fine for music. But what about digitizing the entire
universe, or one’s perception of it at least, and then trying to see
what information is contained in that digital representation?
Data
compression, and the organizing and sorting of the data involved in
that process, would be an approach to getting at what the information
contained in such a digitized world.
"The process of data
compression is the process of categorizing the information that is
there," Gupta said, adding that the wisdom achieved is implicit. "I may
not tell you what that wisdom is in an explicit form, but I’ll give you
a compressed representation of that wisdom. Then I’ll allow you to
search that compressed representation very quickly."
How fast can you find your scissors?
The project also will deal with the speed of wisdom. Sherlock Holmes is a good metaphor for the project goals in that case.
"If you go back and read Sherlock Holmes tales, he does not make every decision in a purely logical way,"
Gupta said. "He employs some undefined cognitive process along with
logic ... Moreover, the value of what he does it would be irrelevant if
he gave you the answer 40 years later."
Holmes' genius was partly his ability to access compressed data quickly, one might argue.
But
to bring the notion of compression to everyday life, a scientific
assessment of any one person's wisdom would be "tough," Gupta said,
because you’d have to digitize someone’s entire life experience via
interviews and other approaches. Even those approaches would be biased
by the interview questions and other contextual issues, like what the
person ate that day, the lighting and so on.
"I think the
wisdom that I’m talking about isn’t as much about human experience but
more about how to deal with the massive amount of data that we have
available," he said. Understanding that data may lead to better
compression.
"It's a compelling goal to attempt to quantify
wisdom in any domain, even if the initial approaches in this project
may not be immediately applicable to readers," Gupta said.
You know it when you hear it
Here’s
another paradox about wisdom — the elderly are the wisest people on
Earth because they’ve been around so long. Or so many people say. But as we age,
our mastery of language starts to drop and many of us sound, to be
frank, more stupid. Our sentences get shorter. Our grammar tends to
decline. And we have trouble recalling ... what is the word? ...
vocabulary. And proper nouns.
These troubles are no joke for
people who lose their ability to convey their thoughts, a condition
called aphasia. This often happens to people who suffer strokes. But
for most people with healthy minds, cognitive decline is as inevitable
as taxes and that other thing.
So Jean Gordon of the University
of Iowa, a communications scientist who has done a lot of work in the
past on aphasia, plans to use the Templeton money to study how our
perception of wisdom varies with how others use language and how that
relates to age. She will use a variety of language measures to test
this on 48 subjects, varying such things as the age of speakers and
what they speak about.
|
Click for related content
|
Wisdom
is in the ear, or really, the mind, of the beholder, she says. More
knowledge about wisdom is perceived and passed on can help medical
providers assist people with language use disorders.
"People’s
perceptions are very tied up in speakers' competence with language.
It's the way that we maintain social connections and maintain our
identity," Gordon said.
© 2008 LiveScience.com. All rights reserved.
|
