速度比完美更重要，思路比题海要有效！

得阅读者得高考英语！

背了海量单词，学了条条框框的语法，英语成绩怎么就是那么低呢？

阅读一定拉后腿了吧！第一名错一两个，自己对七八个，差距就有20多分呢！

攻克阅读就打下了半壁江山哪！

在阅读上花多少时间都不为过。但是，不是收获与付出一定成正比的。还要有正确的战术战略，运筹帷幄。

文章看没看懂不重要，关键是要选对！

阅读必杀技：

◆Main Idea and Title 主题和标题的确定

◆细节,推理判断题的查找和判断

文章取材题秘诀6：文章首尾句看是否有关键信息点,比如book,可能是书的前言或简介,若有价格,与钱有关或访问某网站,则可能是广告(advertisement)!

【2010湖北卷C篇】This brief book is aimed at high school students , but speaks to anyone learning at any stage of life.

Its formal ,serious style closely matches its content ,a school-masterly book on schooling .The author , W .H . Armstrong ,starts with the basics : reading and writing . In his opinion , reading doesn’t just mean recognizing each word on the page ; it means taking in the information,digesting it and incorporating it into oneself just as one digests a sandwich and makes it a part of himself .The goal is to bring the information back to life , not just to treat it as dead facts on paper from dead trees . Reading and writing cannot be completely separated from each other ; in fact ,the aim of reading is to express the information you have got from the text .I’ve seen it again and again ：some-one who can’t express an idea after reading a text is just as ineffective as someone who hasn’t read it at all.

Only a  third of the book remains after that discussion ,which Armstrong devotes to specific tips for studying languages ,math , science and history . He generally handles these topics thoroughly(透彻地) and equally ,except for some weakness in the science and math sections and a bit too much passion(激情) regarding history to his students , that was a  hundred times more than my history teachers ever got across .To my disappointment , in this part of the book he ignores the arts .As a matter of fact ,they demand all the concentration and study that math and science do,though the study differs slightly in kind .Although it’s commonly believed that the arts can only be naturally acquired ,actually ,learning the arts is no more natural than learning French or mathematics.

My other comment is that the text aged. The first edition apparently dates to the 1960s—none of the references(参考文献)seem newer than the late 1950s. As a  result, the discussion misses the entire computer age.

These are small points, though, and don’t affect the main discussion. I recommend it to any student and any teacher, including the self-taught student.

-------------------------------------------------------

66. This passage can be classified as________.

  A. an advertisement          B. a book review

  C. a feature story           D. A news report