For most of us self-confidence is necessary, and for most of us confidence is merely the continuation of an experience or the continuation of knowledge. Does self-confidence ever free the mind from its own conditioning influence? Does this confidence derived through effort to bring about freedom or does it merely condition the mind? And is it not possible to free the mind, to remove all dependences? That is, am I capable of being aware of my loneliness, of my complete emptiness, being aware of it without running away from it, and not being consistent through any particular form of knowledge or experience? 对我们中的多数人而言,自信是必要的,而对于我们中的大多数人来说,信心不过是某种经验或知识的延续而已。自信究竟有没有将头脑从自身局限性的影响中解救出来?这种信心来源于为获取自由而做出的努力,还是说它只会限制人的头脑?有可能解放头脑、清除所有的依赖吗?也就是说,我有能力觉察我的孤独、我的空虚,觉察它而不逃离它,也不通过任何一种形式的知识和经历来保持一贯性吗? That is our problem, is it not? Most of us are running away from ourselves as we are; we cultivate various forms of virtues to help us to run away. We cultivate various forms of confidence, knowledge, experience; we depend on faith; but underneath it all, there is a sense of immense loneliness; and it is only when we are capable of looking at it, living with it, understanding it fully, that there is a possibility of acting without bringing about a series of efforts which condition the mind to a particular action. Please listen to this and you will see it. All our life we try to be consistent to a particular thought or to a pattern of thought, and the very desire to be consistent creates energy, drive, gives us strength and so narrows down the mind. The mind that is consistent is a very small mind, a petty mind. A small mind has enormous capacity for energy; it derives a great deal of strength from its pettiness, and so our life becomes very small, very limited, very narrow. Can we realize this process of dependence from which we derive strength, in which there is conflict, in which there is fear, envy, jealousy, competition, that constantly narrows down all our efforts so that there is always fear? Is it not possible to look, to be aware of our loneliness, of our emptiness and understand it without trying to escape from it? The very understanding of it is not to condemn it, but to be passively aware of it, to listen to the whole content of that loneliness. It means really to go beyond the self, beyond the 'me' and from there act, because our present action is within the confines of the 'me'. It may be enlarged, extended, but it is always the 'me' identifying with a person or an ideal; and that identification gives us a great deal of strength to act, to do, to be, and that identification strengthens the 'me', the 'I', the self in which there is everlasting conflict, everlasting misery; and so all our actions lead to frustration. Recognising that, we turn to faith, we turn to God as a source of strength; and that too is the enlargement of the 'me', the strengthening of the 'me', because the 'me' is running away from itself, from that loneliness in itself. When we are capable of facing that loneliness without condemnation or judgment, looking at it, understanding it, hearing the whole content of the 'me', of that loneliness, then only is there a possibility of having strength which is not of the 'me'. Then only is there a possibility of bringing about a different world or a different culture. Reflections on the Self, ‘Loneliness’
|
|