|
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www. 翻译：风闻天下 转载请注明出处 论坛地址：http://www./bbs/thread-485313-1-1.html NigelTufnel For me the biggest impediment to mobile computing is still the screen size and input methods, not the internet speed. Of course faster speeds don’t hurt, but for me I don’t really get the hype about 5G. Most web pages already load fast on the phone (with The Verge being the exception, there’s a LONG delay now for some reason, even on desktop). 对我来说，移动计算最大的障碍仍然是屏幕尺寸和输入方式，而不是互联网速度。 当然，更快的速度不会伤害我，但是对我来说，我真的不需要关于5 g 的宣传。 大多数网页已经能在手机上快速加载了。 Abbott77 5G is not just about mobile devices though. It’s about the future connectivity of cars and many other devices that will be part of the IOT revolution. It will also allow you to ultimately have one internet provider since it will offer speeds not seen on even fiber to the home with ping times that will rival wired connections. Those speeds will also put pressure on ISP’s to up their speed offerings and coverage to homes as they will have legit competition now from many other providers. Most people look at this technology right now through a very thin and myopic lens but it has many larger implications to our connectivity. 5 g 不仅仅是移动设备。 这关系到未来汽车和其他设备的连通性，这将是物联网革命的一部分。 它还将允许你最终拥有一家互联网供应商，因为它将为家庭提供即使是光纤上也达不到的速度，Ping 时间将与有线连接相匹敌。 这些速度也会给服务供应商带来压力，迫使他们提高速度，扩大覆盖范围，因为他们将面临来自其他供应商的合法竞争。 现在大多数人都透过一个非常窄的眼界来看待这项技术，但是它对我们的连接有许多更大的影响。  LeoMC US means just 33% of all Americans (and has less than 25% of American surface area).The people from Brazil – which are 20% of all Americans – have limited access to internet mainly due to their income; the same goes for the people in Mexico – another 12% of all Americans – that only have lte in the big cities but there are tens of millions Americans that live in the country and hardly have access to 3G.I don’t know the exact number, but I guess not even 60-70% of Americans have access to lte. 美国仅占美洲面积的33%（美国国土面积不到美洲面积的25%）。巴西人占美洲人口的20% ，他们主要由于收入的限制而不能使用互联网; 墨西哥人也是一样，他们只有大城市的 lte 网络，但是有数千万生活在这个国家的美洲人，几乎没有3G 网络。 我不知道确切的数字，但我猜甚至不到60-70% 的美洲人使用 lte。 Abbott77 I’m not talking about a whole other continent than me and the person I was replying to lives in. I wasn’t even referring to other countries. A lot of these technologies don’t even need to exist elsewhere to be successful, but they of course will. So what the internet is like in places I don’t live doesn’t effect me and that’s up to those nations to roll out the needed infrastructure. There are more than enough people in the world in population centers that there is no reason to hold back these advancements because there isn’t adequate coverage elsewhere. 我说的不是另一个大陆，而是我和我的回复对象所在的大陆。 我甚至没有提到其他国家。 许多这样的技术甚至不需要存在于其他地方就能成功，但是它们当然会成功。 因此，在我不住的地方，互联网是什么样子并不影响我，这取决于那些国家是否推出所需的基础设施。 在世界人口中心有足够多的人口，没有理由因为其他地方没有足够的覆盖面，阻止这些进步，。 theeht10 10. But that statistic is bullshit. It’s emblazoned on the verizon billboards but it’s not true. Read the fine print. What they are considering is perhaps where people live, excluding where they may travel and they only talk about a 'signal'. Well, what is a signal? Is it the most minuscule blips on a spectrum analyzer? Or is it something strong enough to make a call with such as a signal strength of -115db or better? You really need to get out more and try making calls and using data on the road. Venture more than a mile beyond the interstate where the other 2% (8 million people) live and report back about that experience. 但是这个统计数据是胡扯。 它被装饰在威瑞森的广告牌上，但这不是真的。 仔细阅读那些小字。 他们考虑的可能是人们居住的地方，不包括他们可能去的地方，他们只谈论'信号'。 什么是信号？ 它是频谱分析仪上最微小的光点吗？ 或者它的信号强度是否足以打电话? 你真的需要出去走走，试着在路上打电话和使用数据。在州际公路以外的地方冒险，其他2%的人（800万人）居住在那里，并汇报他们的经历。 Abbott77 I live in Colorado. I drive all over this and surrounding states. The only places I don’t have signal are places that are foot traffic only in the middle of the wilderness. My father lives 12 miles in from a highway down a dirt road and I get 4G LTE out in his part of the state. I drive all over Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico. I almost never don’t have signal, and when I don’t I’m in literally the middle of nowhere where there is no infrastructure of any kind, electricity or the like. Having cell service cover 100% of the united states is not necessary. Deer, elk and moose don’t need cell coverage. And boo hoo that 2% of people don’t have service. 我住在科罗拉多州。 我开车经过这里和周围的各个州。 我唯一没有信号的地方是那些只有在荒野中间才有行人的地方。 我父亲住在离高速公路12英里的土路上，而我在他住的地方使用4 g LTE 网络。 我开车走遍了怀俄明州，犹他州，新墨西哥州。 我几乎从来没有没有信号，当我没有信号的时候，实际上，我处在一个没有任何基础设施，电力或类似设施的地方。 手机服务覆盖美国100%是没有必要的。 鹿、麋鹿和驼鹿不需要手机信号覆盖。 还有2% 的人没有服务。  Abbott77 And for that reason I choose to have Verizon… But I have the option to choose a different carrier that has the best coverage, as everyone else does. You get what you pay for. Trotting out one carrier’s coverage map when I have several choices is not making your case in the least. Those other swaths are just elk and deer and the occasional cougar, bear, coyote and wolf. 基于这个原因，我选择了威瑞森... ... 但是我可以选择其他覆盖率最好的运营商，就像其他人一样。 一分钱一分货。当我有几个选择的时候，列出一家运营商的覆盖图，根本不代表你的情况。其他的是麋鹿、鹿和偶尔出现的美洲狮、熊、土狼和狼。 foremi And the idea that 5g will be for home internet is a joke. Considering how bad 4G is now and add a much higher frequency and stupid short range I can’t see how it would be viable or even better, especially for those that actually need 4G home internet.So it’s all hype so you can hit your data cap faster downloading who knows what. 5 g 将成为家庭互联网的想法是一个笑话。 考虑到现在4 g 是多么糟糕，再加上更高的频率和愚蠢的短距离，我不知道它如何可行，甚至更好，尤其是那些真正需要4G家庭互联网的人。所以这些都是炒作，所以你可以更快地达到你的数据上限，谁知道下载什么。 tb4000 The goal is for it to replace home broadband entirely as far as what they’re implying. I’ve used that Netgear Nighthawk LTE router before and although it was only 4G it was workable due to the ethernet ports available. 其目标是完全取代家庭宽带，就像他们所暗示的那样。 我以前用过 Netgear nightthawk LTE 路由器，虽然它只有4 g，但由于有以太网端口，它是可用的。 Tex As People in Houston are getting 800 Mbps on Verizon 5g. 休斯顿的人们使用 威瑞森5 g 网络可以获得800mbps 的网速。 Steven Quinn The only problem is customer that Verizon FiOS are in a bigger area and get 1gb and is able to stream in 4k. Anywhere in there house using your cellphone WiFi. Verizon wireless should look at what customer want and not what a company is trying to push onto them. 唯一的问题是，威瑞森的 FiOS 覆盖更大的区域，拥有1GB的容量，能够以4K的速度传输，在那里的任何地方都可以使用你的手机WiFi。 威瑞森通信应该关注顾客想要什么，而不是公司试图强加给他们什么。 JFitzgerald I negotiate against the carriers (wired and wireless) for a living, so I’m no fan of their business practices in general – but – these comments are ridiculous.Have any of you, including the author, actually stopped to think for 15 seconds about the massive technical and financial challenges of creating, from nothing, a 5G network?I’m guessing not.And then in two years all y’all will just take it for granted, or more likely complain it’s not fast enough for some silly game you want to play.I’m so tired of seeing no-nothings complain about people who actually get s(tuff) done. When’s the last time you built anything of value? 我以与运营商(有线和无线)谈判为生，所以我通常不喜欢他们的商业行为——但是——这些评论太荒谬了。你们当中有没有人，包括作者，真的停下来思考过从无到有创建一个5 g 网络所面临的巨大的技术和财务挑战？我猜没有。然后在两年内，你们所有人都会认为这是理所当然的，或者更有可能抱怨它不够快，不足以玩一些你想玩的愚蠢游戏。我已经厌倦了看到没有人抱怨那些真正完成任务的人。 你上一次创造有价值的东西是什么时候？ theagentsmith You are torally right, there isn’t much to complain. For me it’s crazy they already started to rollout 5G in 2019.I only find ridiculous to advertise LTE Advanced as 5G. In Italy the networks call it 4.5G which is reasonable.The Verizon phone switching from 4G to 5G I believe it is the way its firmware is designed and not Verizon fault. It will probably stay in idle on 4G to save power and switch to 5G only when in use. 你说得很对，没什么可抱怨的。 对我来说，他们在2019年就已经开始推出5 g 了，这太疯狂了。 我只是觉得宣传 LTE Advanced 是5 g 网络很荒谬。 在意大利，网络称之为4.5 g，这是合理的。 威瑞森的手机从4 g 切换到5 g 我相信这是它的固件设计方式，而不是 威瑞森的错误。 它可能会切换到4 g 节省电力，只有在使用切换到5 g 时，。 Abbott77 It absolutely could very soon beat fiber when it comes to downloads and gaming everywhere you are. Of course as we stand 5g network availability is just hype, but hype is what creates demand and pushes competition and thus races to deploy in as many places as possible. 在下载和游戏方面，它绝对可以很快击败光纤。 这个观点是完全正确的， 当然，我们站在5 g 网络的可用性只是炒作，但炒作是什么创造需求和推动竞争，因此比赛部署在尽可能多的地方。  IntrepiiD You entirely missed the point of the article. The topic isn’t the service — it’s comparing the service to the companies’ stated claims and illuminating the way that they mislead consumers.I think this is easy enough to understand. 你完全没有抓住这篇文章的要点。 主题不是服务，而是将服务与这些公司的陈述进行比较，并说明它们误导消费者的方式。我认为这很容易理解。 SC310 As per Intrepid’s statement, it is the media’s job to hold corporations accountable. So this is not complaining, but rather a form of fact-checking. 根据 Intrepid 的声明，媒体的工作就是让公司负起责任。 所以这不是抱怨，而是一种事实核查。 |
|
|
