[1] Bergin PF, Doppelt JD, Kephart CJ, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1392-1398.
[2] Baba T, Homma Y, Takazawa N, et al. Is urinary incontinence the hidden secret complications after total hip arthroplasty? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24(8):1455-1460.
[3] Bremer AK, Kalberer F, Pfirrmann CWA, Dora C. Soft- tissue changes in hip abductor muscles and tendons after total hip replacement. Comparison between the direct anterior and the transgluteal approaches. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2011;93- B:886-889.
[4] Rubin L E . The Direct Anterior Approach to Hip Reconstruction[M]. 2016.
[5] Alecci V, Valente M, Crucil M, et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings. J Orthopaed Traumatol. 2011;12:123–129.
[6] Berend K, Lombardi A, Seng B, Adams J. Enhanced early outcomes with the anterior supine intermuscular approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(Supplement 6):107-120.
[7] Mayr E, Nogler M, Benedetti MG, et al. A prospective randomized assessment of earlier functional recovery in THA patients treated by minimally invasive direct anterior approach: a gait analy sis study. Clinical Biomechanics. 2009;24:812-818.
[8] Parvizi J, Rasouli MR, Jaberi M, et al. Does the surgical approach in one stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty affect blood loss? Int Orthop. 2013;37(12):2357-2362.