分享

对清醒梦诱导技术新实证数据的系统回顾

 昵称GklKP 2023-03-15 发布于山东

J. Sleep Res.
Pub Date  : 2022-11-21
DOI : 10.1111/jsr.13786

Shuyue Tan 1,2 , Jialin Fan 1,2

Affiliations

    清醒梦被定义为做梦者在做梦时意识到自己正在做梦的梦。自上次对清醒梦诱导技术的效率进行审查以来,已经过去了大约 12 年。因此,本研究旨在回顾过去十年发表的清醒梦诱导技术。第二个目标是为现有的清醒梦诱导技术提出修改后的分类,包括认知技术、外部刺激、物质干预和皮质刺激。第三个目的是评估纳入审查的研究的方法学质量。假设与上次评价纳入的研究相比,本次评价纳入的研究具有更好的整体方法学质量。本综述共纳入和分析了 19 项经过同行评审的研究,从中确定了 14 种清醒梦诱导技术。结果表明,灵态梦术的助记诱导是诱导灵态梦最有效的方法。此外,两种新技术,即感官启动的清醒梦技术和加兰他敏干预,也可能是清醒梦诱导的竞争候选者,但需要进一步复制。正如假设的那样,本次审查中纳入的研究的总体方法学质量高于先前审查中纳入的研究。总共有 17 项研究的方法学质量中等,而只有三项研究的方法学质量较差。从中确定了 14 种清醒梦诱导技术。结果表明,灵态梦术的助记诱导是诱导灵态梦最有效的方法。此外,两种新技术,即感官启动的清醒梦技术和加兰他敏干预,也可能是清醒梦诱导的竞争候选者,但需要进一步复制。正如假设的那样,本次审查中纳入的研究的总体方法学质量高于先前审查中纳入的研究。总共有 17 项研究的方法学质量中等,而只有三项研究的方法学质量较差。从中确定了 14 种清醒梦诱导技术。结果表明,灵态梦术的助记诱导是诱导灵态梦最有效的方法。此外,两种新技术,即感官启动的清醒梦技术和加兰他敏干预,也可能是清醒梦诱导的竞争候选者,但需要进一步复制。正如假设的那样,本次审查中纳入的研究的总体方法学质量高于先前审查中纳入的研究。总共有 17 项研究的方法学质量中等,而只有三项研究的方法学质量较差。感官启动的清醒梦技术和加兰他敏干预,也可能是清醒梦诱导的竞争候选者,但需要进一步复制。正如假设的那样,本次审查中纳入的研究的总体方法学质量高于先前审查中纳入的研究。总共有 17 项研究的方法学质量中等,而只有三项研究的方法学质量较差。感官启动的清醒梦技术和加兰他敏干预,也可能是清醒梦诱导的竞争候选者,但需要进一步复制。正如假设的那样,本次审查中纳入的研究的总体方法学质量高于先前审查中纳入的研究。总共有 17 项研究的方法学质量中等,而只有三项研究的方法学质量较差。
    英文标题摘要
    A systematic review of new empirical data on lucid dream induction techniques
    Lucid dreams are defined as dreams in which the dreamers are aware of the fact that they are dreaming as dreams continue. It has been ~12 years since the last review of the efficiency of lucid dream induction techniques was conducted. Hence, the present study aimed to review the lucid dream induction techniques published in the past decade. The second aim was to propose a modified classification for the existing lucid dream induction techniques, including cognitive techniques, external stimulation, substance intervention, and cortical stimulation. The third aim was to assess the methodological quality of the studies included in the review. It was hypothesised that, comparing with the studies included in the last review, the studies included in the present review had better overall methodological quality. A total of 19 peer-reviewed studies were included and analysed in the present review, from which 14 lucid dream induction techniques were identified. The results indicated that the mnemonic induction of lucid dream technique was the most effective for inducing lucid dreams. Moreover, two new techniques, the senses-initiated lucid dream technique and galantamine intervention, might also be competitive candidates for lucid dream induction but further replications are needed. As hypothesised, the overall methodological quality of the studies included in the present review was higher than that of the studies included the previous review. In all, 17 studies had moderate methodological quality, whereas only three studies had poor methodological quality.

      本站是提供个人知识管理的网络存储空间,所有内容均由用户发布,不代表本站观点。请注意甄别内容中的联系方式、诱导购买等信息,谨防诈骗。如发现有害或侵权内容,请点击一键举报。
      转藏 分享 献花(0

      0条评论

      发表

      请遵守用户 评论公约

      类似文章 更多