【原】南京西路尾端的零星地块改造

  前段时间走过南京西路愚谷邨对面的，发觉这地方居然也已经人去楼空了，原来这地方已经被土地征收了，由于这段路很少有人走过，真没想到悄然无声中居然这地方已经变了样。原来这段路走的人就少，现在愈发冷清。

  确实最近旧改已经到了零星地块改造的阶段，一些原来开发商看不起眼的零星地块也都开始被土地征收，居民原有局促的生活空间得到了很大的改善。

  这两天恰好有机会到一栋商务楼上俯拍，于是又注意到了这个区域，从整个范围上来看这里的房子比较规整，品相不错，从外面的标语牌上可以看出局部还有可能是部队的产业，现在也可以征收？

  而1955弄一侧一栋楼居然还有文物保护的牌子（1911弄边上的1875号也有相同的牌子），那么本次改造是否都会排除在外？

  当然我最关心的还是土地征收后的用途？是微更新（把人搬空的微更新还没见过）？拆除重建？被边上的文艺会堂（上海文艺活动中心）归于麾下？

 当然我还是把这个位置航拍了一下，这样也可以保留一段永久性的记忆。

  就目前来看市中心的土地征收也不容易，长乐路常熟路西南侧那块地征收居民就不愿意（签约率略超81%，未达到85%的征收意愿要求），说实在如果住的还算宽敞，那何必折腾自己？当然网间传说目前征收补偿金提高了不少，给征收地段的居民又带来了些许诱惑，但是你仔细看，那些号称每平米征收补偿金可以达到15至20万的，原有面积是多少？当你住着50、60平米的房子，他们会给你1000万？当你真正深入了解了居民的实际补偿状态才可以有发言权。

  关于这个路段我还写过：#老寿带你弄堂游#南京西路1522弄及八角楼、2023年静安区土地征收中的永源浜4号地块中有点啥房子？走过去还有：#老寿带你弄堂游#美丽园、以及相关的：一栋已经消失的老洋房故事，马路对面的：#老寿带你弄堂游#愚谷邨。

 The Redevelopment of Scattered Plots at the Tail End of Nanjing West Road

Recently passing by the opposite side of Yugu Village on Nanjing West Road, I was surprised to find that the area had become deserted. It turns out that the land has been requisitioned, and due to the infrequent foot traffic along this stretch, the transformation went unnoticed. What was once a sparsely traversed road is now even more desolate.

Indeed, the urban renewal efforts have progressed to the stage of redeveloping scattered plots, with even those overlooked by developers now subject to land acquisition. This has significantly improved the cramped living spaces of the residents.

Having had the opportunity to overlook the area from a commercial building in recent days, I observed that the houses in this region appear orderly and of good quality. Some signage hints at potential former military properties within the vicinity—properties that are now also subject to acquisition?

Surprisingly, there is a sign indicating the protection of cultural relics on one side of Lane 1955 (a similar sign can be found at 1875 next to Lane 1911). Does this mean that these areas will be exempt from the upcoming redevelopment?

Of course, my primary concern lies in the post-acquisition land use. Will it involve micro-renewal (an unfamiliar concept of vacating and renewing simultaneously)? Demolition and reconstruction? Or will the area fall under the purview of the adjacent Art Hall (Shanghai Art Center)?

These are the questions that weigh heavily on my mind as this transformation unfolds.

Of course, I also took aerial photographs of the location to preserve a lasting memory of it.

Currently, land acquisition in the city center is proving to be challenging. In the southwest corner of Changle Road and Changshu Road, residents are reluctant to agree to the acquisition (with a signing rate slightly exceeding 81%, falling short of the 85% acquisition consent requirement). Truth be told, if one's living space is considered spacious enough, why go through the hassle? Rumors circulating online suggest that the compensation for acquisitions has significantly increased, tempting residents in the acquired areas. However, upon closer inspection, when they claim that the compensation per square meter can reach 150,000 to 200,000, what was the original area? Will they really offer you 10 million when you live in a 50-60 square meter house? Only by delving deeper into the actual compensation status of the residents can one truly have a say in the matter.