Adverse selection can be defined as a phenomenon in the market, that arises due to asymmetric information between buyers and sellers, which leads to a loss for either of the two. This Buzzle article explains more about this concept with some examples.
Did You Know?In 2001, George A. Akerlof was awarded a Nobel Prize for analysis of markets with asymmetric information (shared with other two winners). He is famous for his article 'The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism' (1970), that talks about adverse selection in the market of used cars.Note: Asymmetric information is a situation wherein, one of the parties to the transaction has more knowledge regarding the transaction than the other. He may exploit this information for his advantage. Definition of adverse selection in economics: It is nothing but the potential loss that can be incurred by the buyer or the seller due to asymmetric information in the market. The following are a few examples that will explain this concept further. Examples of Adverse Selection ![]() This case occurs when the insurer conceals a vital parameter in the insurance, that puts the insurer at loss. Thus, the insurance premium is lesser, since the insurer has not factored the risk while calculating the risk potential, due to asymmetric information. As such, the insurance will be less profitable for the insurer, since he is not aware of a critical information that might increase the chances of the insured event happening. How adverse selection affects the health insurance market: This sector is most prone to adverse selection. Typically, those who are at a higher risk to health hazards will find it beneficial to buy an insurance coverage, than a healthy person who is at much lower risk. Those who are healthy will find the premiums too high to pay, hence, they will avoid taking an insurance cover. Also, the insured might hide vital data that might threaten his health or life, and choose not to disclose the information to the insurer. For example, a smoker is at more risk to health hazards, and hence, he will tend to buy an insurance policy to mitigate the risk, than a non-smoker. That means, even non-smokers have to pay high premium, hence, that dissuades them from buying the insurance policy. This is a huge loss to the insurance company. Sometimes, the insurance company might not be able to distinguish between high-risk and low-risk investors, due to which, it might be difficult for them to compute the insurance premium. To curb such a situation, the insurance company might make different plans, and accordingly, the potential insurance investors will choose from the plans. Of course, those who wish for a higher recovery amount will go for a plan, even if it has a high premium, and those with lesser requirements will go for a plan that has lesser insurance premium, though it implies lesser insurance coverage. The other alternative for the insurance company can be to incur costs in making a background check and collecting information about potential insurance investors, thereby making it easy to factor the risk areas, if any. ![]() The stock market is subject to a lot of speculation, and there are high chances that buyers make losses due to adverse selection. Adverse selection will occur due to the difference in knowledge of the informed and the uninformed traders, respectively. Those who are better informed will make more trading benefits than the less-informed. ![]() If a lender does not do a proper verification of the financial position of a firm to which it is lending money, and accordingly, does not charge higher interest rates to high-risk borrowers, it will lead to adverse selection. To mitigate risk, if the lender increases the interest rates, the good parties who cannot afford high interest rates will automatically be driven out. Dangers of Adverse Selection Adverse selection, if unchecked, can create a lot of financial problems. Following are the risks associated with it. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 'The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism' In this paper, George A. Akerlof gave a simple example to understand the impact of asymmetric information and adverse selection on the market. 'Lemon' is an informal word to describe a car that has turned out to be a defective piece after buying it, whereas, 'good car' refers to a well-maintained car. In the market of used cars, both, the lemons and good cars are pooled together, and it is not easy for any buyer to distinguish between them. This leads to asymmetric information, since the sellers have more knowledge of the car than the buyers. That is the reason that the buyers are skeptical before buying the car, and know there is a possibility that the car may turn out to be a lemon. Hence, buyers reduce their reservation prices, which discourages the owners of the good cars. They are driven out of the market, and hence, essentially, only the lemons remain in the market. Instead, the lemons get a higher price than what they deserve. Thus, this asymmetric information leads to adverse selection by the consumers. Thus, as mentioned above, adverse selection is a market failure than can lead to financial losses for either the buyer or the seller. As long as there is lack of adequate information in the market, adverse selection will continue to happen. |
|
来自: Hyksos > 《Economics》