分享

晚期乳腺癌CDK4/6抑制剂耐药有救

 SIBCS 2023-05-22 发布于上海

  细胞有丝分裂周期蛋白依赖性激酶CDK4/6过度活跃是激素受体阳性乳腺癌主要特征之一,也是内分泌治疗耐药主要原因之一。哌柏西利、阿贝西利、瑞波西利等CDK4/6抑制剂联合内分泌治疗与单用内分泌治疗相比,已被证实可显著改善激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌患者的无进展生存和总生存。不过,CDK4/6抑制剂也可发生耐药。虽然临床前研究和临床回顾研究证据表明,CDK4/6抑制剂耐药后,改变内分泌治疗并继续维持CDK4/6抑制剂仍然能够获益,但是缺乏前瞻随机对照研究证据。当然,药企通常不太愿意发起此类备胎研究,需要研究者自己发起。

  2023年5月19日,美国临床肿瘤学会《临床肿瘤学杂志》在线发表埃默里大学、哥伦比亚大学、纽约北岸长岛犹太医疗集团范斯坦医学研究所、纽约大学、纽约西奈山伊坎医学院、祖克医学院、纽约州立石溪大学、蒙蒂菲奥里医疗中心、乔治亚州北、阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校、范德比尔特大学、堪萨斯大学、罗切斯特大学发起的MAINTAIN研究报告,首次对激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌CDK4/6抑制耐药后内分泌治疗±瑞波西利进行了前瞻随机比较。

MAINTAIN (NCT02632045): Study of Efficacy of Ribociclib After Progression on CDK4/6 Inhibition in Patients With HR+ HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer (A randoMized phAse II trIal of fulvestraNt wiTh or Without Ribociclib After Progression on AntI-estrogeN Therapy Plus Cyclin-dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibition in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hormone Receptor +, HER2 - Breast Cancer)


  该研究者发起的双盲安慰剂随机对照二期临床研究于2016年5月至2021年12月从全国13个研究中心入组激素受体阳性HER2阴性晚期乳腺癌既往内分泌治疗+CDK4/6抑制剂治疗期间癌症进展患者119例(其中哌柏西利103例,占86.5%瑞波西利14例,占11.7%)改用氟维司群或依西美坦进行内分泌治疗,并按1∶1的比例随机分为两组:其中59例给予瑞波西利,其余60例给予安慰剂。主要研究终点为无进展生存,定义为随机分组到疾病进展或死亡。假设安慰剂中位无进展生存3.8个月,预设瑞波西利中位无进展生存≥6.5个月为显著有效(进展或死亡风险比≤0.58)。



  结果,中位随访18.2个月后,瑞波西利组与安慰剂组相比:
  • 中位无进展生存:5.29个月比2.76个月(95%置信区间:3.02~8.12个月、2.66~3.25个月)
  • 进展或死亡风险:降低43%(风险比:0.57,95%置信区间:0.39~0.85,P=0.006
  • 半年无进展生存率:41.2%比24.6%
  • 一年无进展生存率:23.9%比7.4%


  亚组分析表明,无论年龄、种族、体力状态评分、内分泌治疗为氟维司群还是依西美坦、既往哌柏西利还是瑞波西利、CDK4/6抑制剂疗程长短、内脏转移与否、骨转移与否、既往内分泌治疗线数、是否初诊已转移、转移后化疗与否、雌激素受体基因ESR1突变与否,瑞波西利组与安慰剂组相比,无进展生存都可获益。



  因此,该小样本前瞻随机对照试验结果表明,对于激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌既往不同内分泌治疗+CDK4/6抑制剂(哌柏西利占86.5%)治疗期间癌症进展患者,改变内分泌治疗+瑞波西利与安慰剂相比无进展生存显著获益,无论其他影响因素如何。虽然该研究可为内分泌治疗+哌柏西利耐药患者提供治疗决策信息,但是仍然需要更多研究来比较瑞波西利与其他二线内分泌治疗选择,例如磷脂酰肌醇激酶PI3K抑制剂、哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白mTOR抑制剂。


J Clin Oncol. 2023 May 19. IF: 50.717

Randomized Phase II Trial of Endocrine Therapy With or Without Ribociclib After Progression on Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibition in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: MAINTAIN Trial.

Kalinsky K, Accordino MK, Chiuzan C, Mundi PS, Sakach E, Sathe C, Ahn H, Trivedi MS, Novik Y, Tiersten A, Raptis G, Baer LN, Oh SY, Zelnak AB, Wisinski KB, Andreopoulou E, Gradishar WJ, Stringer-Reasor E, Reid SA, O'Dea A, O'Regan R, Crew KD, Hershman DL.

Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY; Institute of Health System Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY; New York University Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Zucker School of Medicine-Northwell Cancer Institute, Lake Success NY; State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Northside Hospital, Atlanta, GA; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama, Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS; University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.

PURPOSE: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy (ET) improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Although preclinical and clinical data demonstrate a benefit in changing ET and continuing a CDK4/6i at progression, no randomized prospective trials have evaluated this approach.

METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, phase II, double-blind placebo-controlled trial in patients with HR+/HER2- MBC whose cancer progressed during ET and CDK4/6i, participants switched ET (fulvestrant or exemestane) from ET used pre-random assignment and randomly assigned 1:1 to the CDK4/6i ribociclib versus placebo. PFS was the primary end point, defined as time from random assignment to disease progression or death. Assuming a median PFS of 3.8 months with placebo, we had 80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.58 (corresponding to a median PFS of at least 6.5 months with ribociclib) with 120 patients randomly assigned using a one-sided log-rank test and significance level set at 2.5%.

RESULTS: Of the 119 randomly assigned participants, 103 (86.5%) previously received palbociclib and 14 participants received ribociclib (11.7%). There was a statistically significant PFS improvement for patients randomly assigned to switched ET plus ribociclib (median, 5.29 months; 95% CI, 3.02 to 8.12 months) versus switched ET plus placebo (median, 2.76 months; 95% CI, 2.66 to 3.25 months) HR, 0.57 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.85); P = .006. At 6 and 12 months, the PFS rate was 41.2% and 24.6% with ribociclib, respectively, compared with 23.9% and 7.4% with placebo.

CONCLUSION: In this randomized trial, there was a significant PFS benefit for patients with HR+/HER2- MBC who switched ET and received ribociclib compared with placebo after previous CDK4/6i and different ET.

KEY OBJECTIVE; In this randomized, phase II, double-blind placebo-controlled, investigator-initiated trial, the primary objective was to determine whether there was a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit to switching endocrine therapy (ET; fulvestrant or exemestane) combined with the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) ribociclib versus switching ET combined with placebo in patients with hormone receptor--positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) that progressed during previous ET and CDK4/6i.

KNOWLEDGE GENERATED: Among patients with HR+, HER2- MBC whose tumor progressed on previous ET and CDK4/6i, there was a statistically significant improvement when switching ET and continuing a CDK4/6i with ribociclib versus switching ET and placebo in this randomized trial. Of the 119 randomly assigned participants, the majority of patients (103, 86.5%) previously received palbociclib. At 6 and 12 months, the PFS rate was 41.2% and 24.6% with ribociclib, respectively, versus 23.9% and 7.4% with placebo.

RELEVANCE: The introduction of any new therapy brings a question of what to do at the time of progression. The MAINTAIN trial informs treatment decisions for patients progressing on initial hormone therapy with palbociclib. Additional studies are needed to compare this approach with other second-line hormone therapy options such as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase- and mammalian target of rapamycin-inhibitor based treatments.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02632045

PMID: 37207300

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.02392

    转藏 分享 献花(0

    0条评论

    发表

    请遵守用户 评论公约

    类似文章 更多