|
期刊简介  《国际政治经济学评论》(Review of International Political Economy)是一份涵盖国际政治经济学研究的双月刊同行评审学术期刊。其成立于1999年，由Routledge出版。本刊是国际政治经济学领域的主流期刊之一，与《新政治经济学》(New Political Economy)并列。2022年该刊影响因子为4.3。 本期目录 01 社会环境冲突与土地治理：中国在阿根廷基础设施投资研究 Socio-environmental conflicts and land governance: a study of Chinese infrastructure investments in Argentina 02 “非正式”住房问题的政治经济学：后殖民国家的制度混合性 Political economy of the 'informal’ housing question: institutional-hybridity of the postcolonial state 03 主权危机金融中的国际制度的复杂性：区域架构的比较 International regime complexity in sovereign crisis finance: a comparison of regional architectures 04 核不扩散制度复合体系的不稳定性 The instability of the nuclear nonproliferation regime complex 05 治理网络空间：跨组织的政策边界的政治 Governing cyberspace: policy boundary politics across organizations 06 竞争与制度的复杂架构：国际教育中的权威关系与分化 Competition and regime complex architecture: authority relations and differentiation in international education 07 国际制度复合体的等级与分化：比较研究的理论框架 Hierarchy and differentiation in international regime complexes: a theoretical framework for comparative research 08 国际制度复合体中的价值分化、政策变化与合作 Value differentiation, policy change and cooperation in international regime complexes 本期摘要 社会环境冲突与土地治理：中国在阿根廷基础建设投资研究 题目：Socio-environmental conflicts and land governance: a study of Chinese infrastructure investments in Argentina 作者：Sol Mora，圣马丁国立大学政治与政府学院阿根廷国家科学技术研究委员会 (CONICET) 的博士后研究员。 摘要：本文通过分析土地治理——特别是通过中国基础设施投资在阿根廷试图实施的土地获取，在新葛兰西主义方法和拉丁美洲政治生态学之间建立了对话。在这两种观点之间架起桥梁，将罗伯特·考克斯的框架应用于土地治理固有的社会和环境冲突的研究。对阿根廷的两个土地获取计划的研究，其中一个被暂停，一个修改后继续进行，表明社会抵制可以制约通过投资及其施行进行土地控制的尝试。因此，这两种理论观点之间的对话不仅使考克斯的思想焕发活力，而且将环境和自然治理过程中的社会环境冲突作为IPE的新研究方向。 This article establishes a dialogue between the neo-Gramscian approach and Latin American Political Ecology by analyzing land governance – specifically attempts at land grabbing through Chinese infrastructure investments in Argentina. Building bridges between these two perspectives enables an application of Robert Cox’s framework to the study of socio-environmental conflicts inherent to land governance. The study of two land grabbing initiatives in Argentina, one that was suspended and one that continues with modifications, shows that social resistance can condition attempts at land control through investments and their execution. Consequently, the dialogue between these two theoretical perspectives not only revitalizes Cox’s thought but also highlights socio-environmental conflicts in environmental and nature governance processes as a new research direction for IPE. “非正式”住房问题的政治经济学：后殖民国家的制度混合性 题目：Political economy of the 'informal’ housing question: institutional-hybridity of the postcolonial state 作者：Danish Khan，美国富兰克林与马歇尔学院经济系助理教授兼“不平等、贫困、权力和社会正义倡议”联合主任。 摘要：近年来，国际政治经济学（IPE）学者越来越关注城市问题。然而，他们主要关注的是特定的少数几个全球“城市”在调节资本、商品和服务的全球流动中的角色。尽管如此，IPE文献中存在一个重要的空白在于对新自由主义全球化进程如何影响和规范位于全球南方城市的低收入“非正式”住房部门的探索有限。为了弥补现有IPE文献中的这一空白，本文在新自由主义积累制度的背景下，对非正规住房定居点的形成和拆除过程进行了批判性分析。非正规住房定居点已经得到了批判性地地理学家和城市研究领域学者的广泛研究。本文与众不同之处在于对IPE文献方面做出了独特的贡献，即利用非正规住房定居点的政治经济学作为批判性分析社会本体论和后殖民国家内在矛盾的切入点。本文认为，通过“制度混合性”的视角可以更好地理解非正规住房定居点与后殖民国家之间的关系。这个概念指的是后殖民国家内矛盾的社会经济和制度刺激的融合，旨在同时管理社会再生产和资本主义积累。社会再生产和积累之间固有的张力在非正规住房定居点中以“仁慈-暴力”的辩证法形式表现出来。一方面，后殖民国家试图通过多层次的权力网络“允许”边缘化群体建立非正规住房定居点，以表现出“仁慈”的形象。另一方面，一旦边缘化群体阻碍了房地产主导的资本主义积累，后殖民国家将采取暴力手段驱逐他们。因此，本文认为，IPE学者应仔细考虑非正规住房定居点的政治经济学，因为它提供了有关后殖民国家如何受到调控并被不同的新自由主义全球化社会经济力量拉扯的机制的深入见解。 主权危机金融中的国际制度的复杂性：区域架构的比较 题目：International regime complexity in sovereign crisis finance: a comparison of regional architectures 作者：C. Randall Henning，美利坚大学国际服务学院国际经济关系教授。 摘要：国际制度复杂性理论框定了国际合作的预期，这种预期源自不同机构体系中等级和差异化组合。本文比较了2000年至2019年期间，东亚、拉丁美洲和欧元区危机金融区域复杂体系中地区金融安排与国际货币基金组织之间的关系，并对检验了这些预期。作为全球和地区机构之间的交集国家，债权国在选择这些复杂体系的架构（等级和差异化的组合）方面尤其具有影响力，但受到前几十年所继承的安排的限制。一旦选择了复杂体系的架构，它反过来将影响借款国的政策调整和国家在不满意机构时是追求制度转移还是建立竞争性制度。这些发现总体上符合预期，但超出了核心理论对欧元区政策调整的预期程度。机构间的协作动态填补了这一解释差距。本文的结论是，机构之间的关系对于理解制度复杂体系的结果和演变至关重要，并且比单一制度主义、权力差距假说和其他替代方法提供的解释更完整。 The theory of international regime complexity that frames this study specifies expectations for international cooperation stemming from different combinations of hierarchy and differentiation among institutions in regime complexes. This paper compares relationships between regional financial arrangements and the International Monetary Fund in the regional complexes for crisis finance in East Asia, Latin America, and the euro area during 2000-2019 and tests these expectations. Creditor states that sit at the nexus between global and regional institutions are particularly influential in the choice of architecture (the combination of hierarchy and differentiation) for these complexes but are constrained by arrangements inherited from previous decades. Once chosen, the complex’s architecture in turn shapes policy adjustment in borrowing countries and influences whether states pursue regime shifting or competitive regime creation when dissatisfied with institutions. These findings generally coincide with expectations, but exceed the degree of policy adjustment that the core theory expected for the euro area. Interinstitutional collaboration, the dynamics of which are elaborated, fills this explanatory gap. The paper concludes that relations among institutions are essential for understanding the outcomes and evolution of regime complexes and underpin a more complete explanation than provided by singular institutionalism, the power-gap hypothesis and other alternative approaches. 核不扩散制度复合体系的不稳定性 题目：The instability of the nuclear nonproliferation regime complex 作者：Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni，剑桥大学政治与国际研究系国际组织和全球政治学教授 摘要：本文对核不扩散制度复合体系的制度架构中路径依赖性的变化进行了理论分析，并分析了不同制度复合结构对机构竞争和政策调整的影响。首先，我提出了一个一般性理论，阐述了国际制度复合体系（IRCs）的先有的制度结构如何以一种使IRC易于内生路径依赖性变化的方式促进和限制随后的制度发展。接下来，我阐述了在核不扩散复合体系中，制度转移和竞争性制度建立策略如何引发了路径依赖性的“反应序列”，导致制度分裂日益加剧。为了说明IRC演变的内生动力，我在三个“关键时刻”审视了核不扩散复合体系：20世纪70年代中期、冷战结束时期和21世纪初。在每个时期，外生的扩散冲击与现有的机构结构相互作用，产生了特定的竞争模式，从而引发了日益加剧的制度分裂的反应序列。我的论点对于全球经济治理具有广泛的适用性，并对不断增长的国际政治经济学文献探讨全球治理机构中的反应序列和制度衰败具有重要意义。 This article theorizes path-dependent changes in the institutional architecture of the nuclear nonproliferation regime complex; it analyses the effects of different regime-complex structures on institutional contestation and policy adjustment. I first offer a general theory of how the preexisting institutional structures of international regime complexes (IRCs) facilitate and constrain subsequent institutional developments in ways that make IRCs prone to endogenous, path-dependent change. Next, I illustrate how strategies of regime shifting and rival regime creation in the nuclear nonproliferation complex have triggered path-dependent 'reactive sequencing’, resulting in growing institutional fragmentation. To illustrate endogenous dynamics of IRC evolution, I examine the nuclear nonproliferation complex at three 'critical junctures’: The mid-1970s, the end of the Cold War, and the early-2000s. During each period, exogenous proliferation shocks interacted with pre-existing institutional structures to produce specific patterns of contestation which set in motion a reactive sequence of growing institutional fragmentation. My argument has relevance for global economic governance broadly and for the growing IPE literature which explores reactive sequencing and institutional decay in global governance institutions. 治理网络空间：跨组织的政策边界的政治 题目：Governing cyberspace: policy boundary politics across organizations 作者：Stephanie C. Hofmann，欧洲大学研究所政治与社会科学系教授和罗伯特·舒曼高级研究中心国际关系联合主席；Patryk Pawlak，卡内基欧洲研究中心的访问学者和欧洲大学研究所（佛罗伦萨）罗伯特·舒曼高级研究中心兼职教授。 摘要：政策边界和问题相互依存并非是既定的。它们所涉及的利害关系——由谁治理、如何治理以及政策领域在何处——随着时间的推移被制度化，这通常是由全球北方国家首先制定。我们对这些利害关系如何在组织内部和跨组织制度化的方式知之甚少。为此，我们通过探究一个新兴政策领域如何在一个高度制度化的环境中，如何和取得什么效果来填补这个空白。我们认为，新政策领域，如网络空间或人工智能，促使政府调动资源通过将前景性的问题聚合在新组织和现有组织中进行择地选择政策框架，以建设联盟合作。最初，志同道合的国家在组织中更有可能产生共鸣，从而导致部分差异化的非等级制度复合体。长期而言，竞争性的压力调整，尤其南半球国家所感受到的压力，有助于引发制度向一个协调的一般性组织的制度转变。关键的行动者必须重新调整他们的框架，从而减少差异。在当今的地缘政治世界中，这加剧了组织内部政治分歧。我们在网络空间的案例中检验了三个命题，并展示了跨组织竞争框架的扩散如何导致政策辩论转移到联合国，而在联合国只能进行零碎的政策调整。我们的分析基于一手资料和沉浸式策略。 Policy boundaries and issue interdependence are not a given. The stakes they imply—who governs, how, and where a policy domain is—become institutionalized over time, often first by the Global North. We know little about how these stakes are presented and institutionalized within and across organizations. We tackle this lacuna by asking how, and to what effect, an emerging policy domain is situated in a densely institutionalized environment. We argue that new policy domains such as cyberspace or artificial intelligence prompt resourceful governments to forum-shop policy frames by clustering promising issues in new and existing organizations in pursuit of coalition-building. Initially, resonance is more likely to be established in organizations with like-minded countries, leading to partially differentiated non-hierarchical regime complexes. In the long-term, competing adjustment pressures, particularly felt in the Global South, help trigger a regime-shift to an orchestrating general-purpose organization. Key actors must reconfigure their frames thereby reducing differentiation. In today’s geopolitical world, this hardens intra-organizational political differences. We examine three propositions in the case of cyberspace and show how the proliferation of competing frames across organizations led to shifting the policy debate to the UN, where only piecemeal policy adjustments are possible. Our analysis is based on primary sources and immersion strategies. 与制度的复杂架构：国际教育中的权威关系与分化 题目：Competition and regime complex architecture: authority relations and differentiation in international education 作者：Rie Kijima，多伦多大学蒙克全球事务与公共政策学院的助理教授；Phillip Y. Lipscy，多伦多大学政治学系和蒙克全球事务与公共政策学院教授，及东京大学法学院教授。 摘要：制度复杂性的决定因素和后果是什么？我们认为，国际议题领域的特征——网络效应和进入壁垒——影响了可行竞争的程度，并对权威关系、制度差异化和实质性结果产生了重要影响。竞争倾向于侵蚀现有制度的主导地位，削弱等级制度。竞争下的差异化因权力和物质资源而异：强大的国家试图通过引入无差异化的机构来改变现状，而资源有限的行动者则倾向于针对差异化的利基市场。实质性结果的差异取决于初始的制度配置，特别是在最初被赋予权力的行动者更可能从竞争中失利。我们通过研究国际教育制度复杂体系（这是一个具有极其重要性但经常被忽视的议题领域）来发展这个理论并测试四个假设。 What are the determinants and consequences of regime complexity? We argue that characteristics of international issue areas – network effects and entry barriers – affect the degree of feasible competition, with important consequences for authority relations, institutional differentiation, and substantive outcomes. Competition tends to erode the dominance of status quo institutions, diminishing hierarchy. Differentiation under competition varies according to power and material resources: Powerful states seek to shift the status quo by introducing undifferentiated institutions, while actors with limited resources tend to target differentiated niches. Variation in substantive outcomes depends on the initial configuration of institutions, particularly which actors are originally empowered and thus stand to lose from competition. We develop this theory and test four hypotheses by examining the regime complex for international education, a substantively important but often neglected issue area. 国际制度复合体的等级与分化：比较研究的理论框架 题目：Hierarchy and differentiation in international regime complexes: a theoretical framework for comparative research 作者：C. Randall Henning，美利坚大学国际服务学院国际经济关系教授；Tyler Pratt，北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校政治学助理教授。 摘要：国际制度复杂性的概念提供了一个有用的视角来研究全球治理中国际机构的不断增多。越来越多的国际政治经济学（IPE）文献指出，许多重要政策领域存在重叠的机构集群，然而一些学者认为，复杂性削弱了治理效力，而另一些学者则认为分散的机构优于统一的机构。为了使这些发现具有连贯性，我们提出了一个一般的理论框架，基于两个结构特征来描述制度复杂性：权威关系和机构分化。这些维度共同决定了国家和其他行动者在遵循制度规则时所面临的机遇和限制。因此，它们塑造了重要的结果，例如政策调整、制度转移和创建竞争性制度。本文提出了有关权威和分化效应的可检验假设，并评估它们与本专题的五篇同伴文章所研究的八个制度复杂体的对应关系。我们进一步确定了一组塑造制度复杂体随时间演变的动态过程。我们的框架加强了制度复杂体的比较分析基础，并为研究计划提供了新的议程。 The concept of international regime complexity offers a useful lens for examining the increasing density of international institutions in global governance. A growing literature in International Political Economy (IPE) identifies clusters of overlapping institutions in many important policy areas, yet some scholars argue that complexity undermines governance effectiveness, while others perceive distinct advantages over unified institutions. To bring coherence to these findings, we present a general theoretical framework that characterizes regime complexes based on two structural features: Authority relations and institutional differentiation. These dimensions jointly determine the opportunities and constraints that states and other actors confront as they navigate institutional rules. As a result, they shape important outcomes, such as policy adjustment, regime shifting and competitive regime creation. The article proposes testable hypotheses regarding the effects of authority and differentiation, and we assess their correspondence with the eight regime complexes examined by the five companion articles in this special issue. We further identify a set of dynamic processes that shape the evolution of regime complexes over time. Our framework strengthens the foundation for comparative analysis of regime complexes and charts a new agenda for the research program. 国际制度复合体中的价值分化、政策变化与合作 题目：Value differentiation, policy change and cooperation in international regime complexes 作者：Tyler Pratt，北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校政治学助理教授。 摘要：在国际政治经济学(IPE)的许多议题领域中，国家间的合作受到密集的、不同但重叠的国际机构网络的管理。这种“制度复杂性”环境是增强还是削弱合作一直备受争议。有人认为，重叠的机构增强了合法性和灵活性，而其他人则认为，机会主义的择地选择使得国家能够逃避遵守严格的规则。本文调和了这个争论，证明制度复杂性会根据制度之间的价值差异程度产生不同的影响。在那些不具差异化机构作为替代品的议题领域中，择地选择会降低制度约束国家行为的能力。然而，在那些制度机构通过价值区分的问题领域中，即即随着规则变得更加严格，它们提供的好处也会增加，机构重叠可以促使国家政策变革。本文阐明了这一动态变化，并在对选举观察和与森林相关的碳补偿的政权复合体进行比较分析时提供了经验证据。 In many issue areas in international political economy (IPE), interstate cooperation is governed by a dense network of distinct but overlapping international institutions. Whether this environment of 'regime complexity’ strengthens or undermines cooperation is a subject of intense debate. Some argue that overlapping institutions enhance legitimacy and flexibility, while others claim that opportunistic forum shopping enables states to escape compliance with rigorous rules. This article reconciles this debate, demonstrating that regime complexity has contrasting effects depending on the degree of value differentiation among institutions. In issue areas where undifferentiated institutions function as substitutes, forum shopping will reduce the regime’s ability to discipline state behavior. However, in issue areas where institutions are differentiated by value – i.e. the benefits they provide increase as rules become more rigorous – institutional overlap can increase policy change among states. I demonstrate these dynamics formally and provide empirical evidence in a comparative analysis of the regime complexes for election observation and forest-related carbon offsets. 编译 | 朱嘉成 崔育涞 校对 | 崔育涞 朱嘉成 排版 | 赵弘宇 本文源于《国际政治经济学评论》，本文为公益分享，服务于科研教学，不代表本平台观点。如有疏漏，欢迎指正。  |
|
|
