2019年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)年会于当地时间8月31日-9月4日在法国首都巴黎召开。在此次会议上诺华分别发布了PROVE-HF和EVALUATE-HF两项研究数据,研究显示,沙库巴曲缬沙坦显著改善射血分数降低(HFrEF)心衰患者心脏结构和心功能。 诺华在2019欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)年会上公布的两项研究评估了沙库巴曲缬沙坦改善射血分数降低(HFrEF)心衰患者心脏结构和心功能的疗效及其长期安全性。研究结果同步发布在《美国医学会杂志》上1-5,8。 | 沙库巴曲缬沙坦不仅改善了预后相关的生物标记物,而且心脏结构和心功能也得到了显著的改善,逆转了心脏重构1-11。 | | 沙库巴曲缬沙坦的安全性和耐受性也与既往研究报道的数据相似1,2,3。 | | 沙库巴曲缬沙坦是HFrEF治疗的首选用药,显著改善心衰严重程度和预后。 |
PROVE-HF研究是一项在美国进行、临床IV期、单臂、多中心、开放性研究,共纳入794例HFrEF(NYHA II-IV级)患者,其中654例(82.4%)完成了52周随访1。结果发现,使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗显著改善了N末端-B型钠脑肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平,后者是心衰的关键生物标记物之一,常作为HFrEF临床结局的预示因子。研究首次证实,NT-proBNP的改善不仅与心脏重构的显著改善相关,也与心脏结构和心功能的超声心动图测量指标显著相关1,10,11。更重要的是,NT-proBNP的改变与在随访6个月和1年时反映心脏重构逆转的指标变化显著相关1。
EVALUATE-HF研究是一项临床IV期、前瞻性、随机、多中心、双盲、双模拟(double-dummy)、平行组、活性对照、强制滴定研究,共纳入465例受试者,为期12周,旨在评价沙库巴曲缬沙坦相比依那普利对心脏血管重构和心室-血管偶联(ventricular-vascular coupling,评价心脏机械做功效率的指标)的疗效2。结果表明,沙库巴曲缬沙坦或者依那普利均未改善主要终点,即主动脉阻抗(aortic impedance,血管硬度的测量指标)变化2。阴性结果可能源于研究的持续时间较短、入选患者的主动脉阻抗可能已经得到一定程度的改善2。但是,沙库巴曲缬沙坦相比依那普利改善了左室结构和左室功能,即向全身泵血功能,这一获益与PROVE-HF中获得的研究结果一致,且安全性也与PARADIGM-HF中相当1,2,3。 第12周时,沙库巴曲缬沙坦相比依那普利进一步改善了多项反应心脏结构和心功能的超声心动指标,包括2: 左房容积指数(-2.8 mL/m2; 95% CI:-4.0, -1.6) 二尖瓣E/e'比(-1.8; 95% CI:-2.8, -0.8) 左室收缩末期容积指数(-1.6 mL/m2; 95% CI:-3.1, -0.03) 左室舒张末期容积指数(-2.0 mL/m2; 95% CI:-3.7, -0.3)
心脏重构会降低心脏泵血功能,且预后不良9。因此,逆转心脏重构是HFrEF治疗的关键,不仅逆转心脏损伤,同时改善临床预后9,12。 沙库巴曲缬沙坦适用于射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭(NYHA Ⅱ-Ⅳ级,LVEF ≤40%)成人患者,以降低心血管死亡和心衰住院风险11,12。 References 1. Januzzi J, Prescott M, Butler J, et al. Association of Change in N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Following Initiation of Sacubitril-Valsartan Treatment With Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. JAMA. 2019. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.12821. 2. Desai A, Solomon S, Shah A, et al. Effect of Sacubitril-Valsartan Versus Enalapril on Aortic Stiffness in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;322(11). doi:10.1001/jama.2019.12843. 3. McMurray J, Packer M, Desai A, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:993-1004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409077. 4. Ponikowski P, Voors A, Anker S, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2129-2200. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. 5. Seferovic P, Ponikowski P, Anker S, et al. Clinical practice update on heart failure 2019: pharmacotherapy, procedures, devices and patient management. An expert consensus meeting report of The Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1531. 6. Velazquez E, Morrow D, DeVore, A, et al., Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure. N Engl J Med. 2018. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812851. 7. Chandra A, Lewis E, Claggertt B, et al. The Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Physical and Social Activity Limitations in Heart Failure Patients: The PARADIGM-HF Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(6):498-505. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0398. 8. Yancy C, Jessup M, Butler J, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation. 2017;136:e137-161. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000509. 9. Poelzl G, Frick M, Lackner B, et al. Chronic heart failure is associated with vascular remodeling of the brachial artery. Eur J Heart. 2005;7(1):43-48. 10. Ndumele C, Matsushita K, Sang Y, et al. NT-proBNP and Heart Failure Risk Among Individuals With and Without Obesity: The ARIC Study. Circulation. 2016;133:631-638. 11. Chow S, Maisel A, Anand I, et al. Role of biomarkers for the prevention, assessment, and management of heart failure: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e1054-e1091. 12. Almufleh A, Marbach J, Chih S, et al. Ejection fraction improvement and reverse remodeling achieved with Sacubitril/Valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;7(6):108-113.
|