“各种内固定及关节置换可以选择,包括DHS、Gamma钉、PFNA、InterTAN、关节置换等,其中Gamma钉分三代,它们之间有何区别于联系”?

2016年,欧洲骨科杂志曾发表了一篇综述,我们用AI来分析一下(简直是效率神器)。

AI对于英文提问更友好。我们将这篇文章上传后,用英文提问(为了方便我们阅读,附带了机器翻译)——
(一) Summarize this document in a bullet point outline. Make a markdown table of study questions and answers. 在项目符号大纲中总结本文档。制作学习问题和答案的表格。 Here is a bullet point outline and table summarizing the key information from the research paper on fixation methods for intertrochanteric fractures:以下是项目符号概述和表格,总结了关于粗隆间骨折固定方法的研究论文中的关键信息: Outline 大纲Intertrochanteric fractures are common and comprise nearly half of hip fractures 粗隆间骨折很常见,占髋部骨折的近一半 Internal fixation with sliding hip screw or cephalomedullary nail is standard treatment 使用滑动髋螺钉或头髓钉进行内固定是标准治疗 Fracture pattern, bone quality, fixation method are key factors affecting outcomes 骨折模式、骨质、固定方法是影响结局的关键因素 Sliding hip screw has good results for stable fracture patterns 滑动髋螺钉对于稳定型骨折有良好的效果, Cephalomedullary nails may have advantages for unstable fractures 头髓钉可能对不稳定骨折有优势 Newer nail designs like PFNA show promising results with low complications PFNA等较新的钉子设计显示出有希望的结果,并发症低 
Periprosthetic fracture risk is lower with newer nail designs vs older designs like Gamma nail 与较旧的设计(如伽玛钉)相比,较新的钉子设计有较低的内固定周围骨折风险 Factors affecting failure for sliding hip screw: fracture reduction, screw position, bone quality 影响滑动髋螺钉失效的因素:骨折复位、螺钉位置、骨质 Hemiarthroplasty has higher complications and unclear benefits compared to fixation 与内固定术相比,半关节置换术的并发症更高,获益不明确
Study Question 学习问题 | Answer Summary 答案摘要 |
---|
What are the standard treatment options for intertrochanteric fractures? 转子间骨折的标准治疗方案是什么? | Sliding hip screw and cephalomedullary nail fixation 滑动髋螺钉和头髓钉固定术 | How do outcomes compare between sliding hip screw and cephalomedullary nails? 滑动髋螺钉和头髓钉的结局如何比较? | Sliding hip screw better for stable fractures. Nails may be better for unstable fractures. 滑动髋螺钉更适合稳定骨折。髓内钉可能更适合不稳定的骨折。 | What patient and fracture factors affect choice of fixation method? 哪些患者和骨折因素会影响固定方法的选择? | Fracture pattern, bone quality are key factors. Unstable fractures and poor bone quality favor intramedullary nail. 骨折类型、骨质是关键因素。不稳定的骨折和较差的骨质量最好用髓内钉。 | What are the potential complications of sliding hip screw fixation? 滑动髋关节螺钉固定术有哪些潜在并发症? | Cutout, screw migration, nonunion, periprosthetic fracture 切出、螺钉移位、不愈合、假体周围骨折 | How do newer generation nails like PFNA compare to older designs? 像PFNA这样的新一代钉子与旧设计相比如何? | Lower complications like femoral fracture with newer designs 使用较新的设计降低股骨骨折等并发症 | What is the role of hemiarthroplasty for these fractures? 半关节置换术对这些骨折有什么作用? | Unclear benefits, higher complications than fixation. Select cases only. 益处不明确,并发症高于固定。仅选择案例。 |
Cephalomedullary nails are a type of intramedullary implant used for fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. They have proximal screws that gain fixation in the femoral head, along with a distal intramedullary stem.头髓钉是一种用于固定转子间骨折的髓内植入物。他们有近端螺钉固定在股骨头,远端在骨干髓腔内。
(二) What are the similarities and differences between the three generations of gamma nails? 三代伽马钉之间有何相同点与不同点? 
以下是三代伽玛钉之间的主要异同: Similarities: 相似 之 处: All are cephalomedullary nails with proximal lag screw fixation 均为头髓钉,伴近端拉力螺钉固定 Have a valgus curvature to accommodate the femoral anatomy 有外翻弯曲以适应股骨解剖结构 Allow dynamic compression at the fracture site 允许在骨折部位动态加压
Differences: 差异: First generation Gamma Nail: 第一代伽玛钉: Proximal diameter 17mm 近端直径17毫米 Valgus angle 10° 外翻角 10° Lag screw diameter 12mm 拉力螺杆直径 12mm Distal locking screw 6.5mm 远端锁定螺钉 6.5mm
Second generation Gamma Nail: 第二代伽玛钉: Proximal diameter reduced to 16.5mm 近端直径减小至16.5mm Valgus angle reduced to 4° 外翻角减小至4° Lag screw diameter reduced to 10mm 拉格螺杆直径减小至10mm Distal locking screw changed to 5mm 远端锁定螺钉改为5mm
Third generation Gamma Nail: 第三代伽玛钉: The main goals with each redesign were to improve the fit in the femoral canal, reduce complications like femoral fracture, and improve stabilization of the fracture. 每次重新设计的主要目标是改善股骨管的贴合度,减少股骨骨折等并发症,并提高骨折的稳定性。 (三) What is TAD? Why does TAD affect surgical outcomes? 什么是尖顶距?为什么尖顶距影响手术结果? TAD stands for Tip Apex Distance. It is a measurement used to assess lag screw position in sliding hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. TAD 代表 尖端顶点距离。这是一种用于评估转子间骨折滑动髋螺钉固定术中的拉力螺钉位置的测量值。 TAD is calculated by summing the distance from the tip of the lag screw to the apex of the femoral head on both AP and lateral X-ray views. TAD 的计算方法是将 AP 和侧位 X 线视图上从拉力螺钉尖端到股骨头顶点的距离相加。 Studies have shown that a higher TAD is associated with an increased risk of lag screw cutout and fixation failure. The reasons are: 研究表明,较高的TAD与拉力螺钉切出和固定失败的风险增加有关。原因是: With a lag screw positioned too close to the apex, its purchase in the femoral head is reduced. 当拉力螺钉位置太靠近顶点时,其在股骨头中的锚定会减少。 Positioning the lag screw too superiorly also orientates the forces in a vertical vector during weight bearing, tending to pull the screw vertically out. 在承重过程中,将拉力螺钉定位得太高也会将力定向到垂直矢量中,从而倾向于垂直拉出螺钉。 A TAD greater than 25mm has been associated with higher cutout rates in multiple studies. 在多项研究中,大于 25mm 的 TAD 与较高的切出率相关。
Therefore, surgeons aim to position the lag screw centrally orinferiorly in the femoral head and optimize TAD to below 25mm. This improves the pullout strength and mechanics against vertical forces. TAD is considered one of the most important surgical technique factors affecting outcomes with sliding hip screws. 因此,外科医生的目标是将拉力螺钉定位在股骨头的中央或下部,并将TAD优化到25mm以下。这提高了拉拔强度和抗垂直力的机械性能。TAD被认为是影响滑动髋螺钉预后的最重要的手术技术因素之一。 (四) What are the similarities and differences between interTAN and Gamma Nail? interTAN和Gamma钉的相同点和不同点是什么?
Here are the key similarities and differences between the InterTAN nail and Gamma Nail: 以下是InterTAN钉和伽玛钉之间的主要异同: Similarities: 相似之处: Both are cephalomedullary nail systems 两者都是头髓钉系统 Have proximal lag screw fixation in femoral head/neck 股骨头/颈部有近端滞后螺钉固定 Allow dynamic compression at fracture site 允许在骨折部位动态压缩 Available in different lengths and diameters 提供不同的长度和直径
Differences: 差异: InterTAN: Has trapezoidal proximal shape for rotational stability 具有梯形近端形状,可提高旋转稳定性 Two proximal lag screws that interlock to compress fracture 两个近端拉力螺钉互锁以压缩断裂 Higher load to failure (8000N) compared to Gamma (5000N) 与伽马钉 (5000N) 相比,故障负载 (8000N) 更高 Higher torque resistance (3.8 Nm) than Gamma nail 比伽马钉更高的抗扭矩性 (3.8 Nm)
Gamma Nail: 伽玛指甲: Has a circular proximal shape 具有圆形近端形状 Single lag screw for proximal fixation 用于近端固定的单拉力螺钉 Lower biomechanical strength properties than InterTAN 生物力学强度特性低于InterTAN Associated with higher femoral fracture risk historically 历史上与较高的股骨骨折风险相关
In summary, the InterTAN is a newer generation cephalomedullary nail designed to improve upon limitations of the Gamma Nail, including rotational stability, dual lag screw fixation, and overall biomechanical strength. However, clinical data on outcomes are still limited compared to the proven track record of the Gamma Nail. 总之,InterTAN是新一代头髓钉,旨在改善伽玛钉的局限性,包括旋转稳定性,双滞后螺钉固定和整体生物力学强度。然而,与伽玛钉的良好记录相比,interTAN关于结果的临床数据仍然有限。 (五)请对比不同治疗方案的应用范围

Here is a table comparing the scope of application of different treatment options for intertrochanteric fractures: 下表比较了不同治疗方案对转子间骨折的应用范围: Treatment 治疗 | Scope of Application 适用范围 |
---|
DHS | Stable fracture patterns in patients with good bone quality 骨质良好的患者的骨折类型稳定 | Gamma Nail 伽玛钉 | Unstable fractures in younger patients with good bone stock 骨质良好的年轻患者的不稳定骨折 | PFNA | Unstable fractures in osteoporotic bone; high risk of DHS failure
骨质疏松性不稳定骨折;使用DHS风险高 | InterTAN | Unstable fractures in patients with good bone quality 骨质良好的患者的不稳定骨折 | Hemiarthroplasty 半关节置换术 | Unstable fractures with poor bone quality and comminution; select cases with pre-existing hip arthritis or AVN 不稳定的骨折,骨质差和粉碎;选择已有髋关节炎或 股骨头坏死的病例 |
In summary: 总结: DHS is ideal for simple, stable intertrochanteric fractures DHS 是简单、稳定的转子间骨折的理想选择 Gamma nail and interTAN can be used for unstable fractures in patients with good bone stock Gamma钉和 interTAN 可用于骨质良好的患者的不稳定骨折 PFNA is preferable for unstable fractures in elderly osteoporotic patients PFNA 更适用于老年骨质疏松症患者的不稳定骨折 Hemiarthroplasty is reserved for very unstable comminuted fractures in poor bone 半关节成形术仅用于非常不稳定的、骨质差的粉碎性骨折
The choice depends on the fracture pattern, bone quality, and patient factors. Surgeon experience with each implant is also an important consideration. 选择取决于骨折类型、骨质和患者因素。外科医生对每个植入物的经验也是一个重要的考虑因素。
|